Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Dec;34(12):2859-2866.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05642-x. Epub 2023 Sep 23.

Perineal resuturing versus conservative treatment for dehisced perineal wounds and episiotomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ulla Bismark Kullab  1   2 , Lærke Vinberg Moestrup  3 , Thomas Bergholt  3   4 , Niels Klarskov  3   4 , Hanna Jangö  3   4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Perineal resuturing versus conservative treatment for dehisced perineal wounds and episiotomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ulla Bismark Kullab et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Perineal wound dehiscence is associated with complications, such as infections, perineal pain, dyspareunia, and altered sexual function, that severely affects women's health. Currently, few studies have examined secondary repair of first- and second-degree perineal wound dehiscence and episiotomies, and there is currently no consensus on the optimal treatment option for dehisced perineal wounds. The objective was to evaluate whether resuturing or conservative treatment of first- and second-degree dehisced perineal wounds and episiotomies is the optimal treatment modality in terms of postoperative healing time and other secondary outcomes.

Methods: A systematic literature search was carried out using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. All included studies were evaluated using the SIGN methodology checklist, with the purpose of assessing the study quality.

Results: Three randomized controlled trials were included. Only two small sample-sized studies presented data regarding healing time for both the resuturing and the conservative treatment groups. However, no significant difference was found between the two groups at 4-6 weeks' healing time (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.53-2.52). One study found that women being resutured experienced a significantly reduced healing time and higher satisfaction with the appearance of the wound healing at 3 months compared with the conservative treatment group.

Conclusion: We found no significant differences in the healing time between the resuturing group and the conservative treatment group. However, the sample sizes of the studies were small. A well-designed, large, and prospective randomized controlled trial is needed to evaluate the optimal treatment modality for dehisced perineal wounds.

Keywords: Episiotomy; First-degree perineal tear; Resuturing of perineal wounds; Second-degree perineal tear; Vaginal delivery; Wound dehiscence.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Schmidt LM, Kindberg SF, Glavind-Kristensen M, Bek KM, Nohr EA. Early secondary repair of labial tears, 1st and 2nd degree perineal lacerations and mediolateral episiotomies in a midwifery-led clinic. A retrospective evaluation of cases based on photo documentation. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018;17:75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.07.004 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dudley L, Kettle C, Thomas PW, Ismail KMK. Perineal resuturing versus expectant management following vaginal delivery complicated by a dehisced wound (PREVIEW): a pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e012766. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Dudley LM, Kettle C, Ismail KMK. Secondary suturing compared to non-suturing for broken down perineal wounds following childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008977.pub2 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ramin SM, Ramus RM, Little BB, Gilstrap LC. Early repair of episiotomy dehiscence associated with infection. J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:1104–7. - DOI
    1. Rotem R, Sela HY, Reichman O, Weintraub AY, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Rottenstreich M. Re-suturing of puerperal perineal wound: an assessment of indications, risk factors and outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;251:42–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.028 . - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources