Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 22;31(1):240-255.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad188.

The relationship between electronic health records user interface features and data quality of patient clinical information: an integrative review

Olatunde O Madandola  1 , Ragnhildur I Bjarnadottir  1 , Yingwei Yao  1 , Margaret Ansell  2 , Fabiana Dos Santos  1 , Hwayoung Cho  1 , Karen Dunn Lopez  3 , Tamara G R Macieira  1 , Gail M Keenan  1
Affiliations
Review

The relationship between electronic health records user interface features and data quality of patient clinical information: an integrative review

Olatunde O Madandola et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objectives: Electronic health records (EHRs) user interfaces (UI) designed for data entry can potentially impact the quality of patient information captured in the EHRs. This review identified and synthesized the literature evidence about the relationship of UI features in EHRs on data quality (DQ).

Materials and methods: We performed an integrative review of research studies by conducting a structured search in 5 databases completed on October 10, 2022. We applied Whittemore & Knafl's methodology to identify literature, extract, and synthesize information, iteratively. We adapted Kmet et al appraisal tool for the quality assessment of the evidence. The research protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020203998).

Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. The relationship between 1 or more UI features and 1 or more DQ indicators was examined. UI features were classified into 4 categories: 3 types of data capture aids, and other methods of DQ assessment at the UI. The Weiskopf et al measures were used to assess DQ: completeness (n = 10), correctness (n = 10), and currency (n = 3). UI features such as mandatory fields, templates, and contextual autocomplete improved completeness or correctness or both. Measures of currency were scarce.

Discussion: The paucity of studies on UI features and DQ underscored the limited knowledge in this important area. The UI features examined had both positive and negative effects on DQ. Standardization of data entry and further development of automated algorithmic aids, including adaptive UIs, have great promise for improving DQ. Further research is essential to ensure data captured in our electronic systems are high quality and valid for use in clinical decision-making and other secondary analyses.

Keywords: clinical decision support; data quality; electronic health records; standardized data; user interface.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow chart showing search results.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Sutton RT, Pincock D, Baumgart DC, Sadowski DC, Fedorak RN, Kroeker KI.. An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digit Med. 2020;3(1):1-10. 10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keenan GM, Lopez KD, Yao Y, et al.Toward meaningful care plan clinical decision support: feasibility and effects of a simulated pilot study. Nurs Res. 2017;66(5):388-398. 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000234 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher AM, Mtonga TM, Espino JU, et al.User-centered design and usability testing of RxMAGIC: a prescription management and general inventory control system for free clinic dispensaries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):703. 10.1186/s12913-018-3517-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang AE, Hribar MR, Goldstein IH, Henriksen B, Lin WC, Chiang MF.. Clinical documentation in electronic health record systems: analysis of similarity in progress notes from consecutive outpatient ophthalmology encounters. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018;2018:1310-1318. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keenan GM, Yakel E, Tschannen D, Mandeville M.. Documentation and the nurse care planning process. In: Hughes RG, ed. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Advances in Patient Safety. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. Accessed February 16, 2022. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2674/ - PubMed

Publication types