Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct:335:116216.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116216. Epub 2023 Sep 5.

"Technically an abortion": Understanding perceptions and definitions of abortion in the United States

Affiliations

"Technically an abortion": Understanding perceptions and definitions of abortion in the United States

Alicia J VandeVusse et al. Soc Sci Med. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Anti-abortion legislation in the United States exploits misinformation and ignores medical definitions to curtail access to essential healthcare. Little is known about how individuals most likely to need this care define abortion, in general or as distinct from miscarriage, and how this might impact access to, utilization of, and experiences of care. Using mixed-method card sort and vignette data from cognitive interviews (n = 64) and a national online survey (n = 2009), we examined individuals' understandings of pregnancy outcomes including abortion and miscarriage. Our findings show that people hold varying ideas of what constitutes an abortion. Many respondents considered 'intent' when classifying pregnancy outcomes and focused on intervention to distinguish between miscarriages and abortions. Particularly, medical intervention was found as a defining feature of abortion. Lack of knowledge regarding pregnancy experiences and ambiguity surrounding early stages of pregnancy also influenced respondents' understanding of abortion. We find that abortion and miscarriage definitions are socially constructed and multi-layered. Advancing our understanding of abortion and miscarriage definitions improves reproductive health research by elucidating potential areas of confusion that may lead to misreporting of reproductive experiences as well as highlighting ways that blurred definitions may be exploited by abortion opponents.

Keywords: Abortion; Card sort; Miscarriage; Mixed methods; Vignettes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Distribution of abortion categorization of reproductive experiences from survey (N = 2009).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Assifi AR, Berger B, Tunçalp Ö, Khosla R, Ganatra B, 2016. Women’s awareness and knowledge of abortion laws: a systematic review. PLoS One 11 (3), e0152224. 10.1371/journal.pone.0152224. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baird B, Millar E, 2019. More than stigma: interrogating counter narratives of abortion. Sexualities 22 (7–8), 1110–1126. 10.1177/1363460718782966. - DOI
    1. Bell SO, Fissell ME, 2021. A little bit pregnant? Productive ambiguity and fertility research. Popul. Dev. Rev. 47 (2), 505–526. 10.1111/padr.12403. - DOI
    1. Beynon-Jones SM, 2017. Untroubling abortion: a discourse analysis of women’s accounts. Fem. Psychol. 27 (2), 225–242. 10.1177/0959353517696515. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bommaraju A, Kavanaugh ML, Hou MY, Bessett D, 2016. Situating stigma in stratified reproduction: abortion stigma and miscarriage stigma as barriers to reproductive healthcare. Sex. Reproduct. Healthc. 10, 62–69. 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.10.008. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types