Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 23;10(1):652.
doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02559-4.

The floodplain inundation history of the Murray-Darling Basin through two-monthly maximum water depth maps

Affiliations

The floodplain inundation history of the Murray-Darling Basin through two-monthly maximum water depth maps

David J Penton et al. Sci Data. .

Abstract

With growing concerns over water management in rivers worldwide, researchers are seeking innovative solutions to monitor and understand changing flood patterns. In a noteworthy advancement, stakeholders interested in the changing flood patterns of the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) in Australia, covering an area of 1 million km2, can now access a consistent timeseries of water depth maps for the entire basin. The dataset covers the period from 1988 to 2022 at two-monthly timestep and was developed using remotely sensed imagery and a flood depth estimation model at a spatial resolution of ≈30 m, providing a comprehensive picture of maximum observed inundation depth across the MDB. Validation against 13 hydrodynamic model outputs for different parts of the MDB yielded a mean absolute error of 0.49 m, demonstrating reasonable accuracy and reliability of the dataset. The resulting dataset is best suited to system-wide analysis but might also be useful for those interested in the history of flooding at specific locations in the system. We provide the dataset, visualization tools, and examples to support ongoing research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript and there is no financial interest to report. We certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Maximum floodwater depth. The maximum floodwater depth for the Murray Darling Basin calculated from the two-monthly floodwater depth dataset.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Steps involved in building and distributing the flood water depth product for the Murray Darling Basin. The three panes show steps of the water depth product development. (a) Input data processing involves acquisition of two products: two-monthly maximum water surface extent (from Landsat) and a high-resolution Digital Elevation Model (combined from data sources), which we split into 23 regions for processing. (b) Floodwater Depth Estimation Tool (FwDET) algorithm v2 was used to identify the surface water elevation at the boundary (perimeter) of inundated areas. The perimeter water surface levels (elevations) were interpolated across inundated areas to provide continuous surface water levels. The depth was calculated by subtracting the Digital Elevation Model from the surface water levels and merging (recombining) across the Murray Darling Basin. (c) The resulting water depth rasters were archived in CSIRO’s Data Access Portal, and were also distributed through web services for machine access (i.e. Web Mapping Service) and presented through a geospatial visualisation platform for point-and-click visualisation of water depth across the floodplains of the Murray Darling Basin.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Location of validation sites. These include three reaches of the River Murray in South Australia (A), one reach of River Murray in Victoria (B), and three reaches of the Balonne River (C), where the water depth data were compared to benchmarking hydrodynamic modelling results.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Floodwater depth accuracy for each flood scene. The accuracy is expressed as benchmark minus prediction. The positive values represent underestimation of depth and negative values overestimation. Acronyms on axis labels are Lower Balonne System (LBS), Floodplain (FP), Gunbower Koondrook Perricoota Forest (GKPF) and South Australia (SA).

References

    1. Association of State Floodplain Managers. Flood mapping for the nation: A cost analysis for completing and maintaining the Nation’s NFIP flood map Inventory. (Association of State Floodplain Managers Madison, WI:, 2020).
    1. Grimaldi S, Schumann G, Shokri A, Walker JP, Pauwels VRN. Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls for global coupled hydrologic‐hydraulic modeling of floods. Water Resour Res. 2019;55:5277–5300. doi: 10.1029/2018WR024289. - DOI
    1. Michael Johnson J, Munasinghe D, Eyelade D, Cohen S. An integrated evaluation of the National Water Model (NWM)-Height above nearest drainage (HAND) flood mapping methodology. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 2019;19:2405–2420. doi: 10.5194/nhess-19-2405-2019. - DOI
    1. Penton, D. J. & Overton, I. C. Spatial modelling of floodplain inundation combining satellite imagery and elevation models. MODSIM07 - Land, Water and Environmental Management: Integrated Systems for Sustainability, Proceedings 1464–1470 (2007).
    1. Johnson JM, Munasinghe D, Eyelade D, Cohen S. An integrated evaluation of the national water model (NWM)–Height above nearest drainage (HAND) flood mapping methodology. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 2019;19:2405–2420. doi: 10.5194/nhess-19-2405-2019. - DOI