Union and displacement characteristics following percutaneous screw fixation of superior pubic rami fractures
- PMID: 37742300
- DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03681-0
Union and displacement characteristics following percutaneous screw fixation of superior pubic rami fractures
Abstract
Purpose: To determine union and displacement metrics following percutaneous screw fixation (antegrade or retrograde) of superior pubic rami fractures.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study from a single level 1 trauma center. Skeletally mature patients with at least one superior pubic ramus fracture present as part of a lateral compression-type pelvic ring injury were included.
Results: Eighty-five (85) patients with 95 superior pubic rami fractures met the study's inclusion criteria. LC1, LC2, and LC3 injuries occurred in 76.5%, 15.3%, and 8.2% of patients, respectively. The majority of patients underwent concurrent posterior pelvic ring fixation (94.1%). Superior ramus screw placement occurred predominantly via retrograde technique (81.1%) with cannulated screws of size 6.5 mm or larger (93.7%). Of the 95 eligible fractures, 90 (94.7%) achieved union at a mean of 14.0 weeks (7-40 weeks). Of these united fractures, 69 (76.7%) healed with no measurable displacement, while the remaining 23.3% healed with residual mean displacement of 3.9 mm (range: 0.5-9.0 mm). Multivariable analysis demonstrated a positive association between age (p = 0.04) and initial displacement (p = 0.04) on the final degree of residual displacement at union. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis identified increased age to be significantly related to increased time to union (X2 (2) = 21.034, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Union rates following percutaneous screw fixation of superior pubic rami fractures associated with lateral compression-type pelvic ring injuries approach 95%. Though minimal in an absolute sense, increasing age and a greater degree of initial displacement may influence the final degree of residual displacement at union.
Level of evidence: IV.
Keywords: Complications; Lateral compression pelvic ring injuries; Percutaneous superior ramus fixation; Union and displacement metrics.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Gire JD, Jiang SY, Gardner MJ, Bishop JA (2018) Percutaneous versus open treatment of posterior pelvic ring injuries: changes in practice patterns over time. J Orthop Trauma 32:457–460. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001236 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Whiting PS, Auston D, Avilucea FR et al (2017) Negative stress examination under anesthesia reliably predicts pelvic ring union without displacement. J Orthop Trauma 31:189–193. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000766 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sagi HC, Coniglione FM, Stanford JH (2011) Examination under anesthetic for occult pelvic ring instability. J Orthop Trauma 25:529–536. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822b02ae - DOI - PubMed
-
- Avilucea FR, Archdeacon MT, Collinge CA et al (2018) Fixation strategy using sequential intraoperative examination under anesthesia for unstable lateral compression pelvic ring injuries reliably predicts union with minimal displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:1503–1508. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01650 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wojahn RD, Gardner MJ (2019) Fixation of anterior pelvic ring injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 27:667–676. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00839 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
