Using a validated instrument to assess pregnancy planning and preconception care at antenatal booking visits: a retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 37743071
- DOI: 10.5694/mja2.52109
Using a validated instrument to assess pregnancy planning and preconception care at antenatal booking visits: a retrospective cohort study
Erratum in
-
Erratum.Med J Aust. 2023 Dec 11;219(11):550. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52155. Epub 2023 Nov 4. Med J Aust. 2023. PMID: 37925169 No abstract available.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the completion rate for the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP), a psychometrically validated measure of a woman's intention with regard to a current or recent pregnancy, during booking visits at two metropolitan antenatal care clinics; to identify socio-demographic characteristics associated with unplanned pregnancy.
Design, setting, participants: Retrospective cohort study; analysis of LMUP data for women attending antenatal care booking consultations as public patients in the Sydney Local Health District, 31 December 2019 - 30 November 2020.
Main outcome measures: Proportions of women with LMUP scores indicating unplanned (0-9) or planned pregnancies (10-12); associations between planned pregnancy and socio-demographic characteristics, crude and adjusted for age, parity, and socio-economic status (Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage).
Results: Of 4993 women with antenatal care bookings, the LMUP was completed by 2385 (47.8%; 1142 of 3564 women at the tertiary referral hospital [32.0%], 1118 of 1160 at the secondary hospital [96.3%]). Planned pregnancies were indicated by the total LMUP scores of 1684 women (70.6%); 1290 women (59.1%) reported no health actions in preparation for pregnancy. In multivariable analyses, planned pregnancies were more likely in all age groups than for women aged 24 years or younger (30-34 years: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.76-3.66; 35-39 years: aOR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.95-4.33). The likelihood of planned pregnancy declined with increasing parity (v no previous births: three previous births: aOR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.16-0.40; four or more previous births: aOR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.05-0.19).
Conclusion: Seven in ten women who completed the LMUP had planned their pregnancies, but fewer than half had undertaken health-related actions prior to conceiving. Higher parity was associated with unplanned pregnancy, indicating the importance of postpartum contraception advice. Overcoming barriers to implementing the LMUP more widely would enhance preconception health monitoring.
Keywords: Contraception; Maternal health; Postpartum; Pregnancy.
© 2023 The Authors. Medical Journal of Australia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of AMPCo Pty Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancies amongst women attending antenatal clinics in Pakistan.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 May 30;17(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1339-z. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. PMID: 28558671 Free PMC article.
-
Unplanned pregnancy and contraceptive use in Hull and East Yorkshire.Contraception. 2016 Mar;93(3):233-5. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 28. Contraception. 2016. PMID: 26519645 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of depression at preconception on pregnancy planning and unmet need for contraception in the first postpartum year: a cohort study from rural Malawi.Reprod Health. 2023 Feb 27;20(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01576-1. Reprod Health. 2023. PMID: 36849991 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Nov 5;13:200. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-200. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013. PMID: 24188251 Free PMC article.
-
Introduction of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy at the booking visit and the midwives' perspective.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023 Apr;49(2):112-117. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201576. Epub 2022 Nov 21. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023. PMID: 36410764
Cited by
-
Implementation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in routine antenatal care: A mixed-methods evaluation in three London NHS Trusts.Eur J Midwifery. 2024 Jun 3;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/188118. eCollection 2024. Eur J Midwifery. 2024. PMID: 38832251 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Stephenson J, Heslehurst N, Hall J, et al. Before the beginning: nutrition and lifestyle in the preconception period and its importance for future health. Lancet 2018; 391: 1830-1841.
-
- Fleming TP, Watkins AJ, Velazquez MA, et al. Origins of lifetime health around the time of conception: causes and consequences. Lancet 2018; 391: 1842-1852.
-
- Guerin A, Nisenbaum R, Ray JG. Use of maternal GHb concentration to estimate the risk of congenital anomalies in the offspring of women with prepregnancy diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 1920-1925.
-
- Schummers L, Hutcheon JA, Bodnar LM, et al. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes by prepregnancy body mass index: a population-based study to inform prepregnancy weight loss counseling. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 133-143.
-
- Dorney E, Boyle JA, Walker R, et al. A systematic review of clinical guidelines for preconception care. Semin Reprod Med 2022; 40: 157-169.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical