Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 6:14:1243017.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1243017. eCollection 2023.

An efficient mutagenesis system to improve the propamocarb tolerance in Lecanicillium lecanii (Zimmermann) Zare & Gams

Affiliations

An efficient mutagenesis system to improve the propamocarb tolerance in Lecanicillium lecanii (Zimmermann) Zare & Gams

Yanjun Zhang et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Lecanicillium lecanii (Zimmermann) Zare & Gams is used as an effective biopesticide for the control of sap-sucking insect pests on agricultural crops. However, low fungicide tolerance limits its large-scale field application. To improve the propamocarb tolerance in L. lecanii, a composite mutagenesis system was established by using UV-light (U), N-Methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (NTG) (N) and N+ ion-beam (I). The permutation type of three agents was a consecutive mutagenesis treatment (I/N/U) after an intermittent treatment (U + N + I). The "U" mutagenesis was performed at 254 nm for 60 s and at a distance of 45 cm under a 20 W germicidal lamp, the "N" mutagenesis was performed at a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL NTG for 60 min, and the "I" mutagenesis was performed by low energy N+ ion-beam using a dose of 10 × 1013 ions/cm2 at 30 keV. This composite mutagenesis system was recorded as the "U + N + I + I/N/U," and then the mutagenesis efficiency in improving propamocarb tolerance was assessed by analyzing changes of mutants in the propamocarb sensitivity, mitotic stability, mycelial growth speed on plates or in liquid, sporulation on plates or aphids, conidial germination, 50% lethal concentration (LC50) and 50% lethal time (LT50) to aphids, lipid constituent and cell membrane permeability and control against aphids in the presence or absence of propamocarb. Compared to the wild-type isolate with a 50% effective concentration (EC50) value of 503.6 μg/mL propamocarb, the Ll-IC-UNI produced by the "U + N + I + I/N/U" had the highest EC50 value of 3576.4 μg/mL and a tolerance ratio of 7.1. The mutant was mitotically stable in 20-passage cultivation and did not show any unfavorable changes in growth and virulence indicators. The mutant showed the highest ability to resist or avoid the damaging effects of propamocarb as reflected by the alternations of lipid constituents and membrane permeability. The interval time for applying fungal agent was significantly shortened in this mutant after spraying a field recommended dose of 550 μg/mL propamocarb. In conclude, the "U + N + I + I/N/U" composite mutagenesis mode was efficient and useful to improve the propamocarb-tolerance of L. lecanii and the obtained Ll-IC-UNI could have commercial potential for field application.

Keywords: biological control; entomopathogenic fungi; fungicide tolerance; mutagenesis; pest insects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Propamocarb sensitivity of L. lecanii isolates including the highest-tolerant mutants from each single and composite mutagenesis. Data were means ± SD (n = 3). The EC50 referred to the median effective concentration. Significances between means for each mutant and the wild-type isolate were shown as *p < 0.05 according to the LSD test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fungal biomass of the 7 mutants and the wild-type isolate of L. lecanii. Cultures grew in PDB liquid medium (A) without and (B) with 550 μg/mL propamocarb. Data were means ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cell membrane permeability as indicated by relative conductivity of the 7 mutants and the wild-type isolate of L. lecanii. Cultures grew in PDB liquid medium (A) without and (B) with 550 μg/mL propamocarb. Data were means ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Alterations in proportions of main polar lipid classes for the 7 mutants and the wild-type isolate of L. lecanii. Lipids were extracted from mycelia pre-incubated for 4 d in PDB liquid medium (A) without and (B) with 550 μg/mL propamocarb. Data were means ± SD (n = 3). Significances between means for each mutant and the wild-type isolate were shown as * p < 0.05 according to the LSD test. Lipid abbreviations:DiPtdGly, diphosphatidylglycerol (cardiolipin); PtdCho, phosphatidylcholine; PtdEtn, phosphatidylethanolamine; PtdIns, phosphatidylinositol; PtdOH, phosphatidic acid.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Alterations in proportions of main nonpolar lipid classes for the 7 mutants and the wild-type isolate of L. lecanii. Lipids were extracted from mycelia pre-incubated for 4 d in PDB liquid medium (A) without and (B) with 550 μg/mL propamocarb. Data were means ± SD (n = 3). Significances between means for each mutant and the wild-type isolate were shown as *p < 0.05 according to the LSD test. Lipid abbreviations:DAG, diacylglycerol; MAG, monoacylglycerol; NEFA, nonesterified fatty acid; TAG, triacylglycerol.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Cumulative mortality curves of adult cotton aphids treated with the 7 mutants and the wild-type isolate of L. lecanii. Conidial suspension (105 conidia/ml) plus water control were applied on day 0 after spraying (A) water or (B) propamocarb and on day 3 after spraying (C) water or (D) propamocarb. Propamocarb was sprayed at the filed recommended dose of 550 μg/mL. Data were means ± SD (n = 3).

Similar articles

References

    1. Asman K. (2007). Aphid infestation in field grown lettuce and biological control with entomopathogenic fungi (Deuteromycotina: Hyphomycetes). Biol. Agri. Hortic. 25, 153–173. doi: 10.1080/01448765.2007.9755043 - DOI
    1. Bamisile B. S., Akutse K. S., Siddiqui J. A., Xu Y. (2021). Model application of entomopathogenic fungi as alternatives to chemical pesticides: prospects, challenges, and insights for next-generation sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 12:741804. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.741804, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Behle R., Birthisel T. (2014). “Formulations of entomopathogens as bioinsecticides” in Mass production of beneficial organisms. eds. Morales-Ramos J. A., Rojas M. G., Shapiro-Ilan D. I. (Cambridge: Academic Press; ), 483–517.
    1. Blümel S. (2004). “Biological control of aphids on vegetable crops,” in Biocontrol of protected crops:is lack of biodiversity a limiting factor, eds Heinz K.M., Driesche R.G., Parrella M.P. (Netherlands, Springer; ), 91–112.
    1. Bose J. L. (2014). “Chemical and UV Mutagenesis” in The genetic manipulation of Staphylococci. methods in molecular biology. ed. Bose J. L. (New York: Humana Press; ), 111–115.