Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 12;3(1):osad004.
doi: 10.1093/exposome/osad004.

The ethical aspects of exposome research: a systematic review

Affiliations

The ethical aspects of exposome research: a systematic review

Caspar W Safarlou et al. Exposome. .

Abstract

In recent years, exposome research has been put forward as the next frontier for the study of human health and disease. Exposome research entails the analysis of the totality of environmental exposures and their corresponding biological responses within the human body. Increasingly, this is operationalized by big-data approaches to map the effects of internal as well as external exposures using smart sensors and multiomics technologies. However, the ethical implications of exposome research are still only rarely discussed in the literature. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of the academic literature regarding both the exposome and underlying research fields and approaches, to map the ethical aspects that are relevant to exposome research. We identify five ethical themes that are prominent in ethics discussions: the goals of exposome research, its standards, its tools, how it relates to study participants, and the consequences of its products. Furthermore, we provide a number of general principles for how future ethics research can best make use of our comprehensive overview of the ethical aspects of exposome research. Lastly, we highlight three aspects of exposome research that are most in need of ethical reflection: the actionability of its findings, the epidemiological or clinical norms applicable to exposome research, and the meaning and action-implications of bias.

Keywords: environmental epidemiology; ethics; exposome; omics; personalized medicine; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of article screening process phases.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rappaport SM, Smith MT. Environment and disease risks. Science. 2010;330(6003):460–461. doi: 10.1126/science.1192603. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wild CP. Complementing the genome with an “exposome”: the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(8):1847–1850. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0456. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wild CP. The exposome: from concept to utility. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(1):24–32. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr236. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jongsma KR, Bredenoord AL. Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00524-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strech D, Sofaer N. How to write a systematic review of reasons. J Med Ethics. 2012;38(2):121–126. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100096. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources