Overuse and underuse of thromboprophylaxis in medical inpatients
- PMID: 37745158
- PMCID: PMC10514554
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102184
Overuse and underuse of thromboprophylaxis in medical inpatients
Abstract
Background: Thromboprophylaxis (TPX) prescription is recommended in medical inpatients categorized as high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) by validated risk assessment models (RAMs), but how various RAMs differ in categorizing patients in risk groups, and whether the choice of RAM influences estimates of appropriate TPX use is unknown.
Objectives: To determine the proportion of medical inpatients categorized as high or low risk according to validated RAMs, and to investigate the appropriateness of TPX prescription.
Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of acutely ill medical inpatients from 3 Swiss university hospitals. Participants were categorized as high or low risk of VTE by validated RAMs (ie, the Padua, the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism, simplified, and original Geneva scores). We assessed prescription of any TPX at baseline. We considered TPX prescription in high-risk and no TPX prescription in low-risk patients as appropriate.
Results: Among 1352 medical inpatients, the proportion categorized as high risk ranged from 29.8% with the International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism score to 66.1% with the original Geneva score. Overall, 24.6% were consistently categorized as high risk, and 26.3% as low risk by all 4 RAMs. Depending on the RAM used, TPX prescription was appropriate in 58.7% to 63.3% of high-risk (ie, 36.7%-41.3% underuse) and 52.4% to 62.8% of low-risk patients (ie, 37.2%-47.6% overuse).
Conclusion: The proportion of medical inpatients considered as high or low VTE risk varied widely according to different RAMs. Only half of patients were consistently categorized in the same risk group by all RAMs. While TPX remains underused in high-risk patients, overuse in low-risk patients is even more pronounced.
Keywords: hospitalization; prescriptions; prevention; prophylaxis; risk assessment; venous thromboembolism; venous thrombosis.
© 2023 The Author(s).
Figures


Similar articles
-
Risk Assessment Models for Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Inpatients.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e249980. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9980. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38728035 Free PMC article.
-
Underuse of medical thromboprophylaxis in mobile elderly inpatients: The SWITCO65+ cohort.Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020 Nov 6;5(1):142-147. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12361. eCollection 2021 Jan. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020. PMID: 33537538 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Performance of Clinical Risk Assessment Models for Hospital-Acquired Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Patients.Thromb Haemost. 2018 Jan;118(1):82-89. doi: 10.1160/TH17-06-0403. Epub 2018 Jan 5. Thromb Haemost. 2018. PMID: 29304528
-
Risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in hospitalised adult patients: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 29;11(7):e045672. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045672. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 34326045 Free PMC article.
-
Risk models for VTE and bleeding in medical inpatients: systematic identification and expert assessment.Blood Adv. 2020 Jun 23;4(12):2557-2566. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001937. Blood Adv. 2020. PMID: 32542391 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
What Constitutes High Risk for Venous Thromboembolism? Comparing Approaches to Determining an Appropriate Threshold.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Sep 1:2024.08.30.24312871. doi: 10.1101/2024.08.30.24312871. medRxiv. 2024. PMID: 39252910 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
A need to refine venous thromboembolism risk assessment: the challenge of optimizing patient selection for thromboprophylaxis among hospitalized adults.Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023 Nov 9;7(8):102258. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.102258. eCollection 2023 Nov. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023. PMID: 38193062 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Extended thromboprophylaxis in heart failure patients; the unmet need.Heart Fail Rev. 2024 Sep;29(5):1107-1116. doi: 10.1007/s10741-024-10422-w. Epub 2024 Jul 17. Heart Fail Rev. 2024. PMID: 39014135 Review.
-
Risk Assessment Models for Venous Thromboembolism in Medical Inpatients.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e249980. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.9980. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38728035 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with venous thromboembolism pharmacoprophylaxis initiation in hospitalized medical patients: the Medical Inpatients Thrombosis and Hemostasis study.J Thromb Haemost. 2024 Dec;22(12):3521-3531. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2024.08.016. Epub 2024 Sep 12. J Thromb Haemost. 2024. PMID: 39260742
References
-
- Heit J.A., O’Fallon W.M., Petterson T.M., Lohse C.M., Silverstein M.D., Mohr D.N., et al. Relative impact of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1245–1248. - PubMed
-
- Heit J.A. Venous thromboembolism epidemiology: implications for prevention and management. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2002;28:3–13. - PubMed
-
- Falck-Ytter Y., Francis C.W., Johanson N.A., Curley C., Dahl O.E., Schulman S., et al. Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e278S–e325S. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Goldhaber S.Z., Dunn K., MacDougall R.C. New onset of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients at Brigham and Women's Hospital is caused more often by prophylaxis failure than by withholding treatment. Chest. 2000;118:1680–1684. - PubMed