Implementing an Integrated Generalist-Led Inpatient Care Model: Results of a Mixed-Method Evaluation

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare integration has become prevalent as health systems manage a growing population of older adults with multi-morbid conditions. The integrated general hospital (IGH) is the latest example of how services can be remodelled to achieve greater care integration.

Methods: We conducted a mixed-method evaluation to identify factors impacting the implementation and effectiveness of the IGH model. Data were collected through in-depth interviews (n = 15) and focus group discussions (n = 8 groups) with hospital staff, and a staff survey (n = 226).

Results: Staff perceived improvements in clinical practice and better clinical outcomes for patients. The care model empowered nursing and allied health staff through a more collegial team structure. However, staff reported an unequal workload distribution; a third reported burnout; and some observed inconsistencies between leaders' aspirations for IGH and what was happening on the ground. For IGH to sustain, staff's education on the IGH model needs to be improved. Further examination of work processes is recommended to boost staff morale and prevent burnout.

Conclusion: Overall, IGH provided better integrated, team-based care. The model challenged traditional team structures and empowered staff to expand their roles and responsibilities. Policymakers could consider the IGH model a successful approach for integrating services across the care continuum.

Keywords: chronic disease; health services research; hospital-based; implementation.

Figure 1

Mixed-method approach.