Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 1;5(35):767-772.
doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2023.146.

Effects of Short Interpregnancy Intervals on Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes - Haidian District, Beijing Municipality, China, 2017-2019

Yuan Li  1   2 , Suhong Gao  3 , Jiamei Wang  4 , Hang An  1   2 , Le Zhang  1   2 , Yali Zhang  1   2 , Xiaohong Liu  4 , Zhiwen Li  1   2
Affiliations

Effects of Short Interpregnancy Intervals on Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes - Haidian District, Beijing Municipality, China, 2017-2019

Yuan Li et al. China CDC Wkly. .

Abstract

What is already known about this topic?: Interpregnancy intervals (IPIs) that are either excessively long or short have been linked with an elevated risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Presently, no pertinent guidelines have been established in China to provide clear direction with regard to optimal IPI.

What is added by this report?: A brief interpregnancy interval may elevate the risk of miscarriage, postpartum hemorrhage, and fetal distress among expectant women.

What are the implications for public health practice?: These results could inform prenatal consultations, guiding pregnant women towards an ideal interpregnancy interval of no less than 24 months.

Keywords: Adverse pregnancy outcome; Interpregnancy interval; Miscarriage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure S1
Figure S1
Flowchart representing the participation of individuals in the study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yaya S, Uthman OA, Ekholuenetale M, Bishwajit G, Adjiwanou V Effects of birth spacing on adverse childhood health outcomes: evidence from 34 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(20):3501–8. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1576623. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shree R, Caughey AB, Chandrasekaran S Short interpregnancy interval increases the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes and early delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(22):3014–20. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1362384. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahrens KA, Nelson H, Stidd RL, Moskosky S, Hutcheon JA Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes in high-resource settings: An updated systematic review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019;33(1):O25–47. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12503. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liauw J, Jacobsen GW, Larose TL, Hutcheon JA Short interpregnancy interval and poor fetal growth: Evaluating the role of pregnancy intention. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019;33(1):O73–85. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12506. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

    1. World Health Organization. Report of a WHO technical consultation on birth spacing: Geneva, Switzerland 13–15 June 2005. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/69855.

LinkOut - more resources