Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 1;38(10):104004.
doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/ac8a91. Epub 2022 Sep 8.

Unsupervised knowledge-transfer for learned image reconstruction

Affiliations

Unsupervised knowledge-transfer for learned image reconstruction

Riccardo Barbano et al. Inverse Probl. .

Abstract

Deep learning-based image reconstruction approaches have demonstrated impressive empirical performance in many imaging modalities. These approaches usually require a large amount of high-quality paired training data, which is often not available in medical imaging. To circumvent this issue we develop a novel unsupervised knowledge-transfer paradigm for learned reconstruction within a Bayesian framework. The proposed approach learns a reconstruction network in two phases. The first phase trains a reconstruction network with a set of ordered pairs comprising of ground truth images of ellipses and the corresponding simulated measurement data. The second phase fine-tunes the pretrained network to more realistic measurement data without supervision. By construction, the framework is capable of delivering predictive uncertainty information over the reconstructed image. We present extensive experimental results on low-dose and sparse-view computed tomography showing that the approach is competitive with several state-of-the-art supervised and unsupervised reconstruction techniques. Moreover, for test data distributed differently from the training data, the proposed framework can significantly improve reconstruction quality not only visually, but also quantitatively in terms of PSNR and SSIM, when compared with learned methods trained on the synthetic dataset only.

Keywords: Bayesian deep learning; computed tomography; image reconstruction; pretraining; unsupervised learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) Schematic illustration of the overall iterative reconstructive process, and (b) the architecture of each sub-network.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Representative ground truth images from Ellipses (left), FoamFanB (middle) and LoDoFanB (right) datasets. The window of the LoDoFanB dataset is set to a Hounsfield unit (HU) range ≈ [−1000, 400].
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Sparse-view reconstruction of the FoamFanB dataset along with a zoomed-in region indicated by a small square.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Low-dose human chest CT reconstruction within the LoDoFanB dataset along with a zoomed-in region indicated by a small square. The window is set to a HU range of ≈[−1000, 400].
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Qualitative uncertainty analysis on the FoamFanB dataset. The pixel-wise absolute reconstruction error, (max-min normalised across low-dose and sparse-view CT settings) pixel-wise predictive uncertainty, and its decomposition into the aleatoric and epistemic constituent components for low-dose and sparse-view CT obtained by BDGD and BDGD + UKT.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Qualitative uncertainty analysis on the LoDoFanB dataset. The pixel-wise absolute reconstruction error, (max-min normalised across low-dose and sparse-view CT settings) pixel-wise predictive uncertainty, and its decomposition into the aleatoric and epistemic constituent components for low-dose and sparse-view CT obtained by BDGD and BDGD + UKT.

References

    1. Adler J, Kohr H, Öktem O. Operator discretization library (ODL) 2017 Software available from https://github.com/odlgroup/odl .
    1. Adler J, Öktem O. Solving ill-posed inverse problems using iterative deep neural networks. Inverse Problems. 2017;33:124007. doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/aa9581. - DOI
    1. Adler J, Öktem O. Learned primal-dual reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2018;37:1322–32. doi: 10.1109/tmi.2018.2799231. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akçakaya M, Yaman B, Chung H, Ye J C. Unsupervised deep learning methods for biological image reconstruction and enhancement: an overview from a signal processing perspective. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2022;39:28–44. doi: 10.1109/msp.2021.3119273. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antun V, Renna F, Poon C, Adcock B, Hansen A C. On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction and the potential costs of AI. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:30088–95. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907377117. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources