Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 23;15(8):e43972.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.43972. eCollection 2023 Aug.

The Impact of Ovulation Calculators on the Stress Levels of Fertility-Seeking Couples: An Evaluation Study

Affiliations

The Impact of Ovulation Calculators on the Stress Levels of Fertility-Seeking Couples: An Evaluation Study

Braian R Ledesma et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction Infertility affects a significant portion of couples seeking pregnancy, leading to stress and emotional strain. Ovulation calculators, widely used as a tool to predict fertile days, may play a role in the stress experienced by couples undergoing fertility treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ovulation calculators on the stress levels of couples seeking fertility. Methods Participants were recruited from the University of Miami Health System Clinics. Fifty couples consulting for infertility were asked to participate in the study and complete anonymous self-reported surveys. The surveys consisted of validated questions related to stress levels and the use of ovulation calculators. The completed surveys were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The data collected included age, number of years trying to conceive, and answers to questions related to stress levels and the use of ovulation calculators. Responses from 50 couples who met the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. Results A total of 50 couples who were attempting conception and who completed all the questionnaires were included in the study. Whether or not they were using ovulation calculators, females scored similarly in the four variables of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), including arousal, orgasm, satisfaction, and lubrication. When evaluating International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores for male erectile function, the average score of males tracking ovulation was 12.0 ± 4.8, compared to 11.5 ± 5.4 in male patients who were not (P = 0.81). The results showed no statistically significant difference in stress levels between couples who used ovulation calculators and those who did not. However, in couples experiencing higher stress levels due to infertility, both male and female participants reported higher levels of sexual dysfunction. Fertility-related stress was also found to be significantly associated with mental health implications, with increased anxiety and depression reported by couples undergoing fertility treatments. Conclusion The findings suggest that the use of ovulation calculators did not significantly influence the stress experienced by couples seeking fertility treatment. However, the study highlights the significant impact of infertility-related stress on sexual function and mental health in both male and female partners. These results emphasize the importance of addressing the psychological aspects of infertility and providing comprehensive support to couples undergoing fertility treatments. Further research is warranted to explore the complex interplay between ovulation calculator usage, infertility-related stress, sexual dysfunction, and mental health implications in couples seeking to conceive. Healthcare providers should consider incorporating mental health support into fertility treatment programs to optimize patient outcomes and overall well-being.

Keywords: andrology; infertility; ovulation calculator; sexual dysfunction; stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Representation of Positive and Negative Sexual Outcomes
Questions measuring positive sexual outcomes: arousal, orgasm, satisfaction, and lubrication (maximum score: 5) Male erectile function score (maximum score: 15) Questions measuring negative sexual outcomes: relationship stress and sex life stress (maximum score: 5) FPI (sexual concern) (maximum score: 16) FPI: Fertility Problem Inventory

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. PLoS Med. 2012;9:0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertil Steril. 2020;113:533–535. - PubMed
    1. Home ovulation test use and stress during subfertility evaluation: subarm of a randomized controlled trial. Weddell S, Jones GL, Duffy S, Hogg C, Johnson S, Ledger W. Womens Health (Lond) 2019;15:1745506519838363. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evaluation of sexual dysfunction prevalence in infertile couples. Khademi A, Alleyassin A, Amini M, Ghaemi M. J Sex Med. 2008;5:1402–1410. - PubMed
    1. Real-life insights on menstrual cycles and ovulation using big data. Soumpasis I, Grace B, Johnson S. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020:0. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources