The Impact of Ovulation Calculators on the Stress Levels of Fertility-Seeking Couples: An Evaluation Study
- PMID: 37746350
- PMCID: PMC10515671
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43972
The Impact of Ovulation Calculators on the Stress Levels of Fertility-Seeking Couples: An Evaluation Study
Abstract
Introduction Infertility affects a significant portion of couples seeking pregnancy, leading to stress and emotional strain. Ovulation calculators, widely used as a tool to predict fertile days, may play a role in the stress experienced by couples undergoing fertility treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ovulation calculators on the stress levels of couples seeking fertility. Methods Participants were recruited from the University of Miami Health System Clinics. Fifty couples consulting for infertility were asked to participate in the study and complete anonymous self-reported surveys. The surveys consisted of validated questions related to stress levels and the use of ovulation calculators. The completed surveys were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics. The data collected included age, number of years trying to conceive, and answers to questions related to stress levels and the use of ovulation calculators. Responses from 50 couples who met the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. Results A total of 50 couples who were attempting conception and who completed all the questionnaires were included in the study. Whether or not they were using ovulation calculators, females scored similarly in the four variables of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), including arousal, orgasm, satisfaction, and lubrication. When evaluating International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores for male erectile function, the average score of males tracking ovulation was 12.0 ± 4.8, compared to 11.5 ± 5.4 in male patients who were not (P = 0.81). The results showed no statistically significant difference in stress levels between couples who used ovulation calculators and those who did not. However, in couples experiencing higher stress levels due to infertility, both male and female participants reported higher levels of sexual dysfunction. Fertility-related stress was also found to be significantly associated with mental health implications, with increased anxiety and depression reported by couples undergoing fertility treatments. Conclusion The findings suggest that the use of ovulation calculators did not significantly influence the stress experienced by couples seeking fertility treatment. However, the study highlights the significant impact of infertility-related stress on sexual function and mental health in both male and female partners. These results emphasize the importance of addressing the psychological aspects of infertility and providing comprehensive support to couples undergoing fertility treatments. Further research is warranted to explore the complex interplay between ovulation calculator usage, infertility-related stress, sexual dysfunction, and mental health implications in couples seeking to conceive. Healthcare providers should consider incorporating mental health support into fertility treatment programs to optimize patient outcomes and overall well-being.
Keywords: andrology; infertility; ovulation calculator; sexual dysfunction; stress.
Copyright © 2023, Ledesma et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Sexual Function and Satisfaction in Couples with Infertility: A Closer Look at the Role of Personal and Relational Characteristics.J Sex Med. 2021 Dec;18(12):1984-1997. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Oct 23. J Sex Med. 2021. PMID: 34702685
-
Effectiveness of a mixed lifestyle program in couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology: a study protocol.Reprod Health. 2023 Aug 1;20(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01652-6. Reprod Health. 2023. PMID: 37528465 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of trying to conceive using an every-other-day strategy versus fertile window monitoring on stress: a 12-month randomized controlled trial.Hum Reprod. 2022 Nov 24;37(12):2845-2855. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac228. Hum Reprod. 2022. PMID: 36272105 Clinical Trial.
-
Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.Dan Med Bull. 2006 Nov;53(4):390-417. Dan Med Bull. 2006. PMID: 17150146 Review.
-
Age-related natural fertility outcomes in women over 35 years: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.Hum Reprod. 2020 Aug 1;35(8):1808-1820. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa129. Hum Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32696041
Cited by
-
Algorithms, allyship, and advice: A qualitative analysis of fertility tracker marketing.Digit Health. 2025 Aug 10;11:20552076251356395. doi: 10.1177/20552076251356395. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40799838 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertil Steril. 2020;113:533–535. - PubMed
-
- Evaluation of sexual dysfunction prevalence in infertile couples. Khademi A, Alleyassin A, Amini M, Ghaemi M. J Sex Med. 2008;5:1402–1410. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous