Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep;91(9):913-918.
doi: 10.1007/s12098-023-04848-7. Epub 2023 Sep 25.

Growth Pattern of Preterm Neonates with Fetal Growth Restriction: A Prospective Cohort Study

Affiliations

Growth Pattern of Preterm Neonates with Fetal Growth Restriction: A Prospective Cohort Study

Sarthak Chakrabarti et al. Indian J Pediatr. 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the growth of preterm neonates with fetal growth restriction (FGR) and preterm neonates born appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) from birth to 12-18 mo of corrected age (CA).

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 85 preterm neonates with FGR and 85 gestation- and gender-matched AGA neonates were followed up from birth till 12-18 mo corrected age. Anthropometric indices were compared at specific time points and the risk factors for underweight status were analyzed.

Results: Mean gestational age of the cohort was 32.8 ± 2.1 wk. Mean birth weight was 1414 ± 248 g in the FGR and 1806 ± 416 g in AGA neonates. At 12-18 mo of corrected age, a significantly greater proportion of FGR infants were wasted (24.3% vs. 7.2%, P = 0.005). A greater proportion of FGR infants were underweight (27% vs. 17.4%, P = 0.11), stunted (41.9% vs. 36.2%, P = 0.30), and microcephalic (27% vs. 23.1%, P = 0.36), although the differences were not statistically significant. Significant catch-up growth from 40 wk postmenstrual age (PMA) to 12-18 mo corrected age in weight (52.8% vs. 13.1%, P <0.001) and length (37.9% vs. 8.7%, P <0.001) was observed in the FGR neonates. The z-score of weight for age at 3 mo (adjusted OR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.52-0.8; P <0.001), the median time to full feeds (aOR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.04-1.15; P = 0.001), and hypothyroidism (aOR 2.44, 95% CI: 1.46-4.08; P = 0.001), were independent predictors of underweight status at 12-18 mo.

Conclusions: At 12-18 mo of corrected age, a significantly greater proportion of preterm FGR neonates were wasted compared to AGA ones. The former also exhibited significantly greater catch-up growth than the latter.

Keywords: Catch-up growth; FGR; Preterms; Weight.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Battaglia FC, Lubchenco LO. A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1967;71:159–63. - PubMed
    1. Figueras F, Gratacós E. Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36:86–98. - PubMed
    1. de Onis M, Blössner M, Villar J. Levels and patterns of intrauterine growth retardation in developing countries. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1998;52:S5-15. - PubMed
    1. Murki S, Kallem VR, Gururaj J, Bashir T, Oleti TP, Kiran S. Growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 12 to 18 months of corrected age in preterm infants born small for gestational age. Indian Pediatr. 2020;57:301–4. - PubMed
    1. Sinha B, Choudhary TS, Nitika N, et al. Linear growth trajectories, catch-up growth, and its predictors among north Indian small-for-gestational age low birthweight infants: a secondary data analysis. Front Nutr. 2022;9:827589. - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources