Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 25:12:e38521.
doi: 10.2196/38521.

Epidemiological Modeling of the Impact of Public Health Policies on Hepatitis C: Protocol for a Gamification Tool Targeting Microelimination

Affiliations

Epidemiological Modeling of the Impact of Public Health Policies on Hepatitis C: Protocol for a Gamification Tool Targeting Microelimination

Ricardo Baptista-Leite et al. JMIR Res Protoc. .

Abstract

Background: Hepatitis C is a disease with a strong social component, as its main transmission route is via blood, making it associated with lifestyle. Therefore, it is suitable to be worked on from the perspective of public health policy, which still has a lot of room to explore and improve, contrary to diagnoses and treatments, which are already very refined and effective.

Objective: An interactive gamified policy tool, designated as Let's End HepC (LEHC), was created to understand the impact of policies related to hepatitis C on the disease's epidemiology on a yearly basis until 2030.

Methods: To this end, an innovative epidemiological model was developed, integrating Markov chains to model the natural history of the disease and adaptive conjoint analysis to reflect the degree of application of each of the 24 public health policies included in the model. This double imputation model makes it possible to assess a set of indicators such as liver transplant, incidence, and deaths year by year until 2030 in different risk groups. Populations at a higher risk were integrated into the model to understand the specific epidemiological dynamics within the total population of each country and within segments that comprise people who have received blood products, prisoners, people who inject drugs, people infected through vertical transmission, and the remaining population.

Results: The model has already been applied to a group of countries, and studies in 5 of these countries have already been concluded, showing results very close to those obtained through other forms of evaluation.

Conclusions: The LEHC model allows the simulation of different degrees of implementation of each policy and thus the verification of its epidemiological impact on each studied population. The gamification feature allows assessing the adequate fulfillment of the World Health Organization goals for the elimination of hepatitis C by 2030. LEHC supports health decision makers and people who practice patient advocacy in making decisions based on science, and because LEHC is democratically shared, it ends up contributing to the increase of citizenship in health.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR1-10.2196/38521.

Keywords: hepatitis C; mobile phone; modeling; patient advocacy; public health policies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Final qualitative policies of the public health tool and respective outcomes. DAA: direct-acting antiviral.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic of the Markov model for the progression of chronic hepatitis C. C: chronically infected; DC: decompensated cirrhosis; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV: hepatitis C virus; LM: liver-related mortality; LT: liver transplant; nc: noncirrhotic; PLT: post–liver transplant; SVR: sustained virologic response; U: uninfected.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic of the Markov model for the cure cascade of chronic hepatitis C. C: chronically infected; D: diagnosed; ND: not diagnosed; NRC: not retained in care; NSVR1: no sustained virologic response after first treatment course; NSVR2: no sustained virologic response after second treatment course; NT: not treated; RC: retained in care; SVR: sustained virologic response; T1: first treatment course; T2: second treatment course; U: uninfected (including individuals with sustained virologic response); 1: annual incidence; 2: annual probability of diagnosis; 3: annual probability of being retained in care; 4: annual probability of treatment.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Conceptual model behind the quantification of individual policy measures’ impact on the cure cascade (exemplified with the annual probability of diagnosis). ACA: adaptive conjoint analysis; HCV: hepatitis C virus; PMi–ith policy measure.

Similar articles

References

    1. World Health Organization Hepatitis C. World Health Organization. 2022. Jun 24, [2022-12-06]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-c .
    1. Roudot-Thoraval F. Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2021 May;45(3):101596. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2020.101596.S2210-7401(20)30362-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aisyah DN, Shallcross L, Hully AJ, O'Brien A, Hayward A. Assessing hepatitis C spontaneous clearance and understanding associated factors-a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Viral Hepat. 2018 Jun 13;25(6):680–98. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12866. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ayoub HH, Chemaitelly H, Omori R, Abu-Raddad LJ. Hepatitis C virus infection spontaneous clearance: has it been underestimated? Int J Infect Dis. 2018 Oct;75:60–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2018.07.013. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1201-9712(18)34472-2 S1201-9712(18)34472-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bulteel N, Partha Sarathy P, Forrest E, Stanley AJ, Innes H, Mills PR, Valerio H, Gunson RN, Aitken C, Morris J, Fox R, Barclay ST. Factors associated with spontaneous clearance of chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 2016 Aug;65(2):266–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.04.030.S0168-8278(16)30182-9 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources