Carotid Endarterectomy in the Very Elderly: Short-, Medium-, and Long-Term Outcomes
- PMID: 37748930
- PMCID: PMC10519940
- DOI: 10.5758/vsi.230060
Carotid Endarterectomy in the Very Elderly: Short-, Medium-, and Long-Term Outcomes
Abstract
Purpose: : Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has an established effect on stroke-free survival in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Most landmark trials excluded patients ≥80 years of age due to their perceived high risk and uncertainty regarding the benefits of CEA. Despite the ongoing global increase in life expectancy, guidelines have not changed. The current study aimed to assess CEA outcomes in patients ≥80 years of age.
Materials and methods: : Data from patients ≥80 years of age, who underwent CEA between April 2016 and April 2022, were collected. Demographic information, comorbidities, surgical details, operative details, outcomes, and post-CEA survival were reviewed, and long-term data up to April 2023 were collected.
Results: : Over the 6-year study period, 258 CEA procedures were recorded, of which 70 (27.1%) were performed in patients ≥80 years of age; the mean age was 84 years (range, 80-96 years), 47 (67.1%) were males, and 69 (98.6%) were symptomatic. Twenty-three (32.9%) patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 2, and 47 (67.1%) were grade 3. The 30-day stroke and mortality rates were 4.3% and 1.4%, respectively. At 1, 3, and 5 years, the cumulative freedom-from-stroke rates were 95.7%, 92.9%, and 91.4%, respectively, and the cumulative survival rates were 94.3%, 75.7%, and 61.4%, respectively. No risk factors affected early or late stroke or early mortality rates. Patients with ASA grade 3 had significantly lower cumulative survival than those with grade 2 (HR, 5.29; 95% CI, 1.590-17.603; P<0.01).
Conclusion: : CEA was safe and effective in average-risk, elderly patients. Higher risk patients (i.e., ASA 3) showed no increased 30-day risk for stroke or mortality but exhibited significantly worse long-term survival. Hence, careful consideration of the benefits before performing CEA is crucial.
Keywords: Carotid; Elderly; Endarterectomy; Octogenarians.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Assessment of long-term survival and stroke after carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in patients older than 80 years.J Vasc Surg. 2019 Aug;70(2):522-529. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.121. Epub 2019 Mar 2. J Vasc Surg. 2019. PMID: 30837178
-
Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: does increased age indicate "high risk?".J Vasc Surg. 2005 Feb;41(2):231-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.11.021. J Vasc Surg. 2005. PMID: 15768004
-
Carotid endarterectomy is safe for octogenarians.J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;77(1):176-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.169. Epub 2022 Aug 6. J Vasc Surg. 2023. PMID: 35940506
-
Carotid Endarterectomy versus Carotid Stenting or Best Medical Treatment in Asymptomatic Patients with Significant Carotid Stenosis: A meta-analysis.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 May;20(5):413-423. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 6. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019. PMID: 30057288
-
A systematic review supporting the Society for Vascular Surgery Guidelines on the management of carotid artery disease.J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1S):99S-108S.e42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 19. J Vasc Surg. 2022. PMID: 34153350
Cited by
-
Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Vascular Surgery.Vasc Specialist Int. 2025 Apr 30;41:8. doi: 10.5758/vsi.240120. Vasc Specialist Int. 2025. PMID: 40302180 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Carotid endarterectomy in the asymptomatic elderly: a systematic review of literature.Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Oct 19;47(1):806. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03058-9. Neurosurg Rev. 2024. PMID: 39425805
-
Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians compared to their younger counterparts: a retrospective observational study.Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024 May;106(5):248-254. doi: 10.4174/astr.2024.106.5.248. Epub 2024 Apr 30. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024. PMID: 38725804 Free PMC article.
-
Should octogenarians and people aged 90 years and over be treated separately in studies of stroke? An evaluation of national audit data.Age Ageing. 2025 May 31;54(6):afaf164. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf164. Age Ageing. 2025. PMID: 40499130 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, Warlow CP, Barnett HJ. Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery. Lancet. 2004;363:915–924. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15785-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15785-1. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Halliday A, Harrison M, Hayter E, Kong X, Mansfield A, Marro J, et al. 10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1074–1084. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61197-X. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61197-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Naylor R, Rantner B, Ancetti S, de Borst GJ, De Carlo M, Halliday A, et al. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 clinical practice guidelines on the management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023;65:7–111. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.011. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wadén K, Hultgren R, Kotopouli MI, Gillgren P, Roy J, Hedin U, et al. Long term mortality rate in patients treated with carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023;65:778–786. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.02.079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.02.079. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1493–1501. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040127. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa040127. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous