Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 25;13(1):85.
doi: 10.1186/s13550-023-01035-9.

Reduced hematopoietic-inflammatory response and worse outcomes in patients with recurrent myocardial infarction in comparison with primary myocardial infarction

Affiliations

Reduced hematopoietic-inflammatory response and worse outcomes in patients with recurrent myocardial infarction in comparison with primary myocardial infarction

Yao Lu et al. EJNMMI Res. .

Abstract

Background: Recurrent myocardial infarction (RMI) portends an unfavorable outcome, which might be related to diminished hematopoietic-inflammatory activation. We aimed to investigate the hematopoietic-inflammatory activation and the outcome in categorized patients with primary myocardial infarction (PMI) versus RMI as well as chronic stable angina (CSA) by 18F-FDG PET.

Results: A total of 105 patients (88 males; 60.1 ± 9.7 years) were included. Target-to-background ratio of bone marrow (TBRBM) was highest in the PMI group (n = 45), intermediate in the RMI group (n = 30), and lowest in the CSA group (n = 30) (P < 0.001). RMI group exhibited larger scar, significantly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and enlarged end systolic volume in comparison with the PMI and CSA groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Additionally, there was a significantly positive correlation between TBRBM and TBRaorta (P < 0.001). The cumulative major adverse cardiac events free survival of patients in the RMI group was lower than that in the PMI and CSA groups during a median follow-up of 16.6 months (P = 0.026).

Conclusions: RMI conferred relatively decreased hematopoietic-inflammatory activation compared with PMI. Patients with RMI presented subsequent enlarged myocardial scar, worsened cardiac dysfunction, aggravated remodeling, and worse outcomes than that in PMI patients.

Keywords: Bone marrow; Hematopoiesis; Positron emission tomography; Recurrent myocardial infarction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
BM, Splenic, and aortic 18F-FDG activity among the three groups. The 18F-FDG activity of BM (a) and aorta (c) was highest in the PMI group, intermediate in the RMI group, and lowest in the CSA group. The splenic (b) 18F-FDG activity did not differ significantly among the three groups. TPD (%, d), Scar (%, e), HM (%, f), LVEF (%, g), EDV (mL, h), and ESV (mL, i) among the three groups. BM, bone marrow; CSA, chronic stable angina; EDV, end-diastolic volume; ESV, end-systolic volume; HM, hibernating myocardium; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; PMI, primary myocardial infarction; RMI, recurrent myocardial infarction; TPD, total perfusion deficit. *P < 0.05. **P < 0.01. ***P < 0.005. ns, no significance
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Correlations of BM, aortic and splenic 18F-FDG activity. There was a significantly positive correlation between BM and aortic 18F-FDG activity (a); There was no correlation between BM and splenic 18F-FDG activity in the overall study population (b). BM, bone marrow
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Representative examples of BM, spleen and aorta. BM, Splenic, and aortic 18F-FDG activity among the three groups. The coronal fusion of BM, axial fusion of spleen and aorta. BM, bone marrow
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Kaplan–Meier for MACE-free survival curve among the three groups. The cumulative MACE-free survival of patients in the RMI group was significantly lower than that in the PMI and CSA groups. CSA, chronic stable angina; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; PMI, primary myocardial infarction; RMI, recurrent myocardial infarction

References

    1. Thune JJ, Signorovitch JE, Kober L, McMurray JJ, Swedberg K, Rouleau J, et al. Predictors and prognostic impact of recurrent myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or both following a first myocardial infarction. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011;13:148–153. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq194. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Song J, Murugiah K, Hu S, Gao Y, Li X, Krumholz HM, et al. Incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of recurrent acute myocardial infarction in China. Heart. 2020;107:313–318. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317165. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson JL, Morrow DA. Acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2053–2064. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1606915. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nahrendorf M. Myeloid cell contributions to cardiovascular health and disease. Nat Med. 2018;24:711–720. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0064-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dutta P, Courties G, Wei Y, Leuschner F, Gorbatov R, Robbins CS, et al. Myocardial infarction accelerates atherosclerosis. Nature. 2012;487:325–329. doi: 10.1038/nature11260. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources