Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Sep 25;23(1):325.
doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02275-x.

Intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to plain ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized trial for ED50 determination using an up-down sequential allocation method

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to plain ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized trial for ED50 determination using an up-down sequential allocation method

Xiaofei Mo et al. BMC Anesthesiol. .

Abstract

Background: Intrathecal dexmedetomidine, as an adjuvant to local anesthetics, has been reported to improve the quality of spinal anesthesia and reduce the required local anesthetic dose. However, the optimal dosage regimen for intrathecal dexmedetomidine combined with plain ropivacaine for cesarean section (CS) remains undetermined. The present study aimed to determine the median effective dose (ED50) of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to plain ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia during CS.

Methods: Sixty parturients undergoing CS were randomly assigned to either group: plain ropivacaine 8 mg (Group Rop8) or plain ropivacaine 10 mg (Group Rop10). The initial dosage of intrathecal dexmedetomidine in each group was 5 µg. The effective dose was defined as a bilateral sensory block at the level of T6 or above to pinprick attained within 10 min after intrathecal injection, without the need for supplementary intraoperative epidural anesthesia. Effective or ineffective responses were determined, followed by a 1 µg increment or decrement in the dose of intrathecal dexmedetomidine for the next parturient using up-down sequential allocation. ED50 were calculated using probit regression.

Results: The ED50 of intrathecal dexmedetomidine with plain ropivacaine was 5.9 µg (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.9-7.4 µg) in Group Rop8 and 3.1 µg (95% CI, 0.1-4.8 µg) in Group Rop10 (P < 0.05). Hemodynamic stability, side effects, patient satisfaction and neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions: The present data suggested that the ED50 of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 8 mg and 10 mg plain ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia during cesarean section was approximately 6 µg and 3 µg, respectively.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier: ChiCTR2200055928.

Keywords: Cesarean section; Dexmedetomidine; Ropivacaine; Spinal anesthesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Individual response to intrathecal dexmedetomidine coadministered with ropivacaine at the corresponding dose (µg). The ED50 of intrathecal dexmedetomidine coadministered with ropivacaine for cesarean section was 5.9 µg (95% CI, 4.9 to 7.4 µg) in Group Rop8 and 3.1 µg (95% CI, 0.1 to 4.8 µg) in Group Rop10 using probit regression. An effective intrathecal block is denoted by a filled circle, while an ineffective block is denoted by an open circle. Dashed lines indicate the position of the estimates of ED50
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Dose‒response curves for intrathecal dexmedetomidine coadministered with ropivacaine for cesarean section in the two groups derived from probit regression analysis. Dashed lines indicate the position of the estimates of ED50

References

    1. Ng K, Parsons J, Cyna AM, Middleton P. Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):D3765. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seki H, Shiga T, Mihara T, et al. Effects of intrathecal opioids on cesarean section: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anesth. 2021;35(6):911–27. doi: 10.1007/s00540-021-02980-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arzola C, Wieczorek PM. Efficacy of low-dose bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(3):308–18. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer200. - DOI - PubMed
    1. an de Velde M. Low-dose spinal anesthesia for cesarean section to prevent spinal-induced hypotension. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019;32(3):268–70. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000712. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Uppal V, Retter S, Casey M, et al. Efficacy of Intrathecal Fentanyl for Cesarean Delivery: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials with Trial Sequential Analysis. Anesth Analg. 2020;130(1):111–25. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003975. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources