Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Sep 25;28(1):372.
doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01341-x.

Carbapenem is not always the best choice in the treatment of septic shock

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Carbapenem is not always the best choice in the treatment of septic shock

Lu Wang et al. Eur J Med Res. .

Abstract

Background: Septic shock is a global public health burden. In addition to the improvement of the level of individual care, the improvement of the overall hospital quality control management is also an essential key aspect of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC). Using of antibiotics is a cornerstone in the treatment of septic shock, so we conducted this study to investigate the influence of antibiotics and pathogenic bacteria on the mortality of septic shock at the level of overall hospital in China.

Methods: This was an observational database study in 2021 enrolled the data of 787 hospitals from 31 provinces/municipalities/autonomous regions of Mainland China collected in a survey from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021.

Results: The proportion of ICU patients with septic shock was 3.55%, while the patient mortality of septic shock was 23.08%. While carbapenem was the most preferred antibiotic medication used in 459 of the 782 hospitals, the preference for carbapenem did not show significant effect on the patient mortality in the treatment of septic shock (p-value 0.59). Compared with patients with fermenting bacteria as the most common pathogenic bacteria causing septic shock, patients with non-fermenting bacteria had a higher mortality (p-value 0.01).

Conclusions: Whether using carbapenem as the preferred antibiotic or not, did not show effect on the patient mortality of septic shock. Compared with patients with fermenting bacteria as the most common pathogenic bacteria, patients of septic shock with non-fermenting bacteria had a higher mortality.

Keywords: Carbapenem; Fermenting bacteria; Hospital management; Mortality; Septic shock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient mortality of septic shock
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effects of antibiotics and pathogenic bacteria on the patient mortality of septic shock. With carbapenem using carbapenem as the preferred antibiotic medication, without carbapenem not using carbapenem as the preferred antibiotic medication. Non-fermenting detecting non-fermenting bacteria as the most common pathogenic bacteria causing septic shock, fermenting detecting fermenting bacteria as the most common pathogenic bacteria causing septic shock
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effects of antibiotics and pathogenic bacteria on the patient mortality of septic shock. With carbapenem using carbapenem as the preferred antibiotic medication, without carbapenem not using carbapenem as the preferred antibiotic medication. Non-fermenting detecting non-fermenting bacteria as the most common pathogenic bacteria causing septic shock, fermenting detecting fermenting bacteria as the most common pathogenic bacteria causing septic shock.* p < 0.05, compared with the Non-fermenting group.

Similar articles

References

    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dugar S, Choudhary C, Duggal A. Sepsis and septic shock: guideline-based management. Clevel Clin J Med. 2020;87:53–64. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.87a.18143. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vincent JL, Jones G, David S, Olariu E, et al. Frequency and mortality of septic shock in Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2019;23:196. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2478-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lasater KB, Sloane DM, McHugh MD, Cimiotti JP, et al. Evaluation of hospital nurse-to-patient staffing ratios and sepsis bundles on patient outcomes. Am J Infect Control. 2021;49:868–873. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.12.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Breen SJ, Rees S. Barriers to implementing the Sepsis Six guidelines in an acute hospital setting. Br J Nurs. 2018;27:473–478. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2018.27.9.473. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types