Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Implant placement and loading protocols
- PMID: 37750529
- DOI: 10.1111/clr.14137
Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Implant placement and loading protocols
Abstract
Objectives: Working Group 5 was convened to discuss and find consensus on the topics of implant placement and loading protocols associated with single missing teeth in the anterior maxilla (aesthetic zone). Consensus statements, clinical recommendations, patient perspectives and future research suggestions were developed and presented to the plenary for discussion and approval.
Materials and methods: Two systematic reviews were developed and submitted prior to the conference. The group considered in detail the systematic reviews and developed statements, clinical recommendations, patient perspectives and future research suggestions based on the findings of the reviews and experience of group members. Definitive versions were developed after presentation to and discussion by the plenary.
Results: Five consensus statements were developed and approved from each systematic review. Twelve clinical recommendations were developed by the group based on both reviews and experience. Three patient perspectives were developed, and five suggestions made for future research.
Conclusions: Based on the findings of the systematic reviews and experience of group members, the Type 1A protocol (immediate placement and immediate loading), when utilized in the anterior maxilla under favorable conditions, is considered predictable and is associated with high survival rates. The procedure is considered clinically viable and is associated with aesthetic outcomes, although surgical, technical, and biological complications can occur.
Keywords: bone implant interactions; clinical assessment; diagnosis; loading; placement; prosthodontics; surgical techniques.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Belser, U. C., Grutter, L., Vailati, F., Bornstein, M. M., Weber, H. P., & Buser, D. (2009). Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. Journal of Periodontology, 80(1), 140-151.
-
- Benic, G. I., Mir-Mari, J., & Hammerle, C. H. F. (2014). Loading protocols for single-implant crowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 29(Suppl), 222-238.
-
- Chen, S. T., Beagle, J., Jensen, S. S., Chiapasco, M., & Darby, I. (2009). Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding surgical techniques. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 24 Suppl, 272-278.
-
- Chen, S. T., & Buser, D. (2009). Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sockets. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 24 Suppl, 186-217.
-
- Chen, S. T., Wilson, T. G., Jr., & Hammerle, C. H. F. (2004). Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: Review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 19(Suppl), 12-15.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources