Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Oct 1;36(4):408-424.
doi: 10.3344/kjp.23220.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in central post-stroke pain: current status and future perspective

Affiliations
Review

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in central post-stroke pain: current status and future perspective

Riva Satya Radiansyah et al. Korean J Pain. .

Abstract

Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is an incapacitating disorder that impacts a substantial proportion of stroke survivors and can diminish their quality of life. Conventional therapies for CPSP, including tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and opioids, are frequently ineffective, necessitating the investigation of alternative therapeutic strategies. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is now recognized as a promising noninvasive pain management method for CPSP. rTMS modulates neural activity through the administration of magnetic pulses to specific cortical regions. Trials analyzing the effects of rTMS on CPSP have generated various outcomes, but the evidence suggests possible analgesic benefits. In CPSP and other neuropathic pain conditions, high-frequency rTMS targeting the primary motor cortex (M1) with figure-eight coils has demonstrated significant pain alleviation. Due to its associaton with analgesic benefits, M1 is the most frequently targeted area. The duration and frequency of rTMS sessions, as well as the stimulation intensity, have been studied in an effort to optimize treatment outcomes. The short-term pain relief effects of rTMS have been observed, but the long-term effects (> 3 months) require further investigation. Aspects such as stimulation frequency, location, and treatment period can influence the efficacy of rTMS and ought to be considered while planning the procedure. Standardized guidelines for using rTMS in CPSP would optimize therapy protocols and improve patient outcomes. This review article provides an up-to-date overview of the incidence, clinical characteristics, outcome of rTMS in CPSP patients, and future perspective in the field.

Keywords: Analgesics; Central Post-Stroke Pain; Cerebral Cortex; Intractable; Neuralgia; Opioid; Pain; Quality of Life; Stroke; Therapeutics; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation..

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic illustration of the pathophysiology central post-stroke pain (CPSP). There are several structural and functional changes associated with the development of CPSP, including reduced M1 stimulation in the affected part of the brain, thalamic injuries, brain plasticity changes, and central sensitization.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment mechanism in central post-stroke pain (CPSP). Schematic illustration showing the mechanisms behind the use of rTMS to treat CPSP includes increasing CBF, normalizing connectivity between MD and amygdala, increasing neurotransmitter release, altering neuronal plasticity, and modulating cortical excitability. CBF: cerebral blood flow, MD: mediodorsal, BDNF: brain-derived neurotrophic factor, NGF: nerve growth factor, GABA: gamma-aminobutyric acid, NMDA: N-methyl-D-aspartate, LTP: long-term potentiation, LTD: long-term depression, ICI: intracortical inhibition, ICF: intracortical facilitation.

References

    1. Jönsson AC, Lindgren I, Hallström B, Norrving B, Lindgren A. Prevalence and intensity of pain after stroke: a population based study focusing on patients' perspectives. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77:590–5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.079145. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kong KH, Woon VC, Yang SY. Prevalence of chronic pain and its impact on health-related quality of life in stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:35–40. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00369-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Naess H, Lunde L, Brogger J. The effects of fatigue, pain, and depression on quality of life in ischemic stroke patients: the Bergen Stroke Study. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:407–13. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S32780. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oh H, Seo W. A comprehensive review of central post-stroke pain. Pain Manag Nurs. 2015;16:804–18. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2015.03.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. MacGowan DJ, Janal MN, Clark WC, Wharton RN, Lazar RM, Sacco RL, et al. Central poststroke pain and Wallenberg's lateral medullary infarction: frequency, character, and determinants in 63 patients. Neurology. 1997;49:120–5. doi: 10.1212/WNL.49.1.120. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources