Influence of the presence of dental implants on the accuracy and difficulty level of diagnosis of furcation involvement in molars: An in vitro CBCT study
- PMID: 37752682
- DOI: 10.1111/clr.14182
Influence of the presence of dental implants on the accuracy and difficulty level of diagnosis of furcation involvement in molars: An in vitro CBCT study
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the possible interference of image artifacts (IA) generated by dental implants in the evaluation of furcation involvement (FI) in molars.
Methods: Tomographic scans of first molars (1M) were performed in dry skulls in the absence and presence of titanium (TI) and zirconia (ZI) dental implants. FI grades were simulated in the alveoli of the 1Ms. Diagnostic accuracy of FI and level of difficulty were verified. Chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis were used.
Results: There was no difference in the diagnostic accuracy of FI between the arches (p = .117). The highest diagnostic accuracy value for the implant variable was found in the absence of implants (88.3%) and the lowest in the presence of two ZI implants (66.7%). The highest diagnostic accuracy value for FI was observed in grade 0 (G0). There was no significant difference between the arches regarding the evaluators' perception of difficulty (p > .05). Assessments were considered difficult in 12.7% of the TI implants and in 29% of the ZI implants. Regarding the number of dental implants, assessments were considered difficult in 24.4% cases including one implant and 17.4% cases including two implants. The logistic regression model showed a significant p-value only for one and two ZI implants (p = .0061 and p = .0096, respectively).
Conclusion: The presence of dental implants in the region adjacent to the area of investigation of FI decreased the diagnostic accuracy while increasing the perception of difficulty by the examiners, especially in cases with ZI implants.
Keywords: cone-beam computed tomography; dental implants; diagnostic accuracy; furcation defects; imaging artifacts.
© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Assiri, H., Dawasaz, A. A., Alahmari, A., & Asiri, Z. (2020). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in periodontal diseases: A systematic review based on the efficacy model. BMC Oral Health, 20(1), 1-15.
-
- Candemil, A. P., Salmon, B., Freitas, D. Q., Ambrosano, G. M. B., & Oliveira, M. L. (2018). Metallic materials in the exomass impair cone beam CT voxel values. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 47, 20180011.
-
- Choi, I. G. G., Cortes, A. R. G., Arita, E. S., & Georgetti, M. A. P. (2018). Comparison of conventional imaging techniques and CBCT for periodontal evaluation: A systematic review. Imaging Science in Dentistry, 48(2), 79-86.
-
- Demirturk Kocasarac, H., Ustaoglu, G., Bayrak, S., Katkar, R., Geha, H., Deahl, S. T., Mealey, B. L., Danaci, M., & Noujeim, M. (2019). Evaluation of artifacts generated by titanium, zirconium, and titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants on MRI, CT, and CBCT images: A phantom study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 127(6), 535-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2019.01.074
-
- Eickholz, P., & Kim, T. S. (1998). Reproducibility and validity of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters as related to different probes. Journal of Periodontology, 69(3), 328-336.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
