Mechanical Power Correlates With Stress, Strain, and Atelectrauma Only When Normalized to Aerated Lung Size in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
- PMID: 37753234
- PMCID: PMC10519489
- DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000982
Mechanical Power Correlates With Stress, Strain, and Atelectrauma Only When Normalized to Aerated Lung Size in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Abstract
Objectives: First, to investigate whether the severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) influences ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) risk in ventilated patients with similar mechanical power of respiratory system (MPRS). Second, to determine whether, under these circumstances, there is a relationship between transpulmonary mechanical power (MPTp) normalized to the aerated lung (specific lung mechanical power or SLMP) and VILI risk, and third, to determine whether normalizing MPRS to compliance of respiratory system (CRS) can replace SLMP to bedside.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: The study was conducted in a tertiary academic ICU.
Patients: The study included 18 patients with ARDS.
Interventions: Ventilatory settings were adjusted to achieve a similar MPRS.
Measurements and main results: Mechanical power was normalized to CRS (specific mechanical power or SMP = MPRS/CRS), and SLMP was calculated as the ratio between MPTp and end-expiratory lung volume (SLMP = MPTp/EELV). The strain was defined as the ratio between tidal volume and EELV (strain = Vt/EELV), stress as transpulmonary pressure at the end of inspiration, and atelectrauma as the difference between expiration and inspiration in the nonaerated lung. Although patients had been ventilated with similar MPRS = 23.75 (23-24) J/min and MPTp = 11.6 (10.8-12.8) J/min, SLMP increased linearly with the fall in Pao2/Fio2 (R = -0.83, p = 0.0001). MPRS only correlated positively with VILI-associated mechanisms when normalized to aerated lung size: correlations between SLMP and stress (R = 0.9, R2 = 0.84, p = 0.00004), strain (R = 0.97, R2 = 0.94, p < 0.00001) and atelectrauma (R = 0.82, R2 = 0.70, p = 0.00002), and correlations between SMP and stress (R = 0.86, R2 = 0.75, p = 0.00001), strain (R = 0.68, R2 = 0.47, p = 0.001) and atelectrauma (R = 0.67, R2 = 0.46, p = 0.002).
Conclusions: The results suggest that normalizing mechanical power to lung-aerated size or CRS may correlate positively with stress, strain, and atelectrauma.
Keywords: acute respiratory distress syndrome; mechanical power; mechanical ventilation and respiratory failure; ventilator-induced lung injury.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
The study was funded by the participating hospital. The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Silva PL, Ball L, Rocco PRM, et al. : Physiological and pathophysiological consequences of mechanical ventilation. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2022; 43:321–334 - PubMed
-
- Cressoni M, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, et al. : Mechanical power and development of ventilator-induced lung injury. Anesthesiology 2016; 124:1100–1108 - PubMed
-
- Serpa Neto A, Deliberato RO, Johnson AEW, et al. ; PROVE Network Investigators: Mechanical power of ventilation is associated with mortality in critically ill patients: An analysis of patients in two observational cohorts. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44:1914–1922 - PubMed
-
- Gattinoni L, Pesenti A: The concept of “baby lung.”. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31:776–784 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources