Research priorities for care of preterm or low birth weight infants: health policy
- PMID: 37753444
- PMCID: PMC10518498
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102126
Research priorities for care of preterm or low birth weight infants: health policy
Abstract
Research priorities for preterm or low birth weight (LBW) infants were advanced in 2012, and other research priority-setting exercises since then have included more limited, context-specific research priorities pertaining to preterm infants. While developing new World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for care of preterm or LBW infants, we conducted a complementary research prioritisation exercise. A diverse, globally representative guideline development group (GDG) of experts - all authors of this paper along with WHO steering group for preterm-LBW guidelines - was assembled by the WHO to examine evidence and consider a variety of factors in intervention effectiveness and implementation, leading to 25 new recommendations and one good practice statement for care of preterm or LBW infants. The GDG generated research questions (RQs) based on contributions to improvements in care and outcomes of preterm or LBW infants, public health impacts, answerability, knowledge gaps, feasibility of implementation, and promotion of equity, and then ranked the RQs based on their likelihood to further change or influence the WHO guidelines for the care of preterm or LBW infants in the future. Thirty-six priority RQs were identified, 32 (89%) of which focused on aspects of intervention effectiveness, and the remaining four addressed implementation ("how") questions. Of the top 12 RQs, seven focused on further advancing new recommendations - such as family involvement and support in caring for preterm or LBW infants, emollient therapy, probiotics, immediate KMC for critically ill newborns, and home visits for post-discharge follow-up of preterm or LBW infants - and three RQs addressed issues of feeding (breastmilk promotion, milk banks, individualized feeding). RQs prioritised here will be critical for optimising the effectiveness and delivery of new WHO recommendations for care of preterm or LBW infants. The RQs encompass unanswered research priorities for preterm or LBW infants from prior prioritisation exercises which were conducted using Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) methodology.
Funding: Nil.
Keywords: Low birth weight; Neonatal mortality; Newborn health; Preterm infant; Prioritisation; Research priorities.
© 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
MB is board member, MSF, Sweden. RC reports receiving consulting fees from the World Health Organization to serve as methodologist for the development of the guidelines on which this manuscript is based. SM is a member of European Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants (EFCNI) Trustee Board and the EFCNI Executive Board; participation in both EFCNI boards is nonpaid. Other authors declare no other competing interests.
References
-
- Perin J., Mulick A., Yeung D., et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-19: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022;6(2):106–115. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00311-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- WHO recommendations for care of the preterm or low birth weight infant. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2022. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
