Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 20;8(5):441.
doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8050441.

An Enhanced Hunger Games Search Optimization with Application to Constrained Engineering Optimization Problems

Affiliations

An Enhanced Hunger Games Search Optimization with Application to Constrained Engineering Optimization Problems

Yaoyao Lin et al. Biomimetics (Basel). .

Abstract

The Hunger Games Search (HGS) is an innovative optimizer that operates without relying on gradients and utilizes a population-based approach. It draws inspiration from the collaborative foraging activities observed in social animals in their natural habitats. However, despite its notable strengths, HGS is subject to limitations, including inadequate diversity, premature convergence, and susceptibility to local optima. To overcome these challenges, this study introduces two adjusted strategies to enhance the original HGS algorithm. The first adaptive strategy combines the Logarithmic Spiral (LS) technique with Opposition-based Learning (OBL), resulting in the LS-OBL approach. This strategy plays a pivotal role in reducing the search space and maintaining population diversity within HGS, effectively augmenting the algorithm's exploration capabilities. The second adaptive strategy, the dynamic Rosenbrock Method (RM), contributes to HGS by adjusting the search direction and step size. This adjustment enables HGS to escape from suboptimal solutions and enhances its convergence accuracy. Combined, these two strategies form the improved algorithm proposed in this study, referred to as RLHGS. To assess the efficacy of the introduced strategies, specific experiments are designed to evaluate the impact of LS-OBL and RM on enhancing HGS performance. The experimental results unequivocally demonstrate that integrating these two strategies significantly enhances the capabilities of HGS. Furthermore, RLHGS is compared against eight state-of-the-art algorithms using 23 well-established benchmark functions and the CEC2020 test suite. The experimental results consistently indicate that RLHGS outperforms the other algorithms, securing the top rank in both test suites. This compelling evidence substantiates the superior functionality and performance of RLHGS compared to its counterparts. Moreover, RLHGS is applied to address four constrained real-world engineering optimization problems. The final results underscore the effectiveness of RLHGS in tackling such problems, further supporting its value as an efficient optimization method.

Keywords: Hunger Games Search; Rosenbrock Method; benchmark; engineering optimization problems; logarithmic spiral; swarm intelligence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of RLHGS.
Figure 2
Figure 2
3-D map of some 23 classic benchmark functions. Different colors represent different solutions to the function, the mark of “F1”, “F2” etc. in the figure refer to the corresponding function.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) 3-D distributions of test functions, (b) 2-D position distribution of RLHGS, (c) RLHGS trajectories in the first dimension, (d) convergence curve of RLHGS. The line is generated by the projection of a three-dimensional figure. Different color represents different solution of function.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) balance analysis of the RLHGS, (b) balance analysis of the HGS, (c) convergence curves of RLHGS and HGS.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Convergence curves of RLHGS, RHGS, LHGS, and HGS on eight CEC2020 functions.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Friedman test results on 23 classic benchmark functions.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Convergence curves of compared algorithms on six classic benchmark functions.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Friedman test results on CEC2020.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Convergence curves of compared algorithms on four CEC2020 functions.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Structure of the tension/compression spring problem.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Shape of the welded beam design problem.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Components of the pressure vessel design problem.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Components of the 3-bar truss design problem.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lu Z., Cheng R., Jin Y., Tan K.C., Deb K. Neural Architecture Search as Multiobjective Optimization Benchmarks: Problem Formulation and Performance Assessment. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 2022:1. doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2022.3233364. - DOI
    1. Wang Z., Zhao D., Guan Y. Flexible-constrained time-variant hybrid reliability-based design optimization. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2023;66:89. doi: 10.1007/s00158-023-03550-8. - DOI
    1. Bai X., Huang M., Xu M., Liu J. Reconfiguration Optimization of Relative Motion Between Elliptical Orbits Using Lyapunov-Floquet Transformation. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2022;59:923–936. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2022.3193089. - DOI
    1. Lu C., Zheng J., Yin L., Wang R. An improved iterated greedy algorithm for the distributed hybrid flowshop scheduling problem. Eng. Optim. 2023:1–19. doi: 10.1080/0305215X.2023.2198768. - DOI
    1. Zhang K., Wang Z., Chen G., Zhang L., Yang Y., Yao C., Wang J., Yao J. Training effective deep reinforcement learning agents for real-time life-cycle production optimization. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2022;208:109766. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109766. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources