Ceftobiprole for Treatment of Complicated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
- PMID: 37754204
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2300220
Ceftobiprole for Treatment of Complicated Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
Abstract
Background: Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin that may be effective for treating complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus.
Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial, adults with complicated S. aureus bacteremia were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ceftobiprole at a dose of 500 mg intravenously every 6 hours for 8 days and every 8 hours thereafter, or daptomycin at a dose of 6 to 10 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 24 hours plus optional aztreonam (at the discretion of the trial-site investigators). The primary outcome, overall treatment success 70 days after randomization (defined as survival, bacteremia clearance, symptom improvement, no new S. aureus bacteremia-related complications, and no receipt of other potentially effective antibiotics), with a noninferiority margin of 15%, was adjudicated by a data review committee whose members were unaware of the trial-group assignments. Safety was also assessed.
Results: Of 390 patients who underwent randomization, 387 (189 in the ceftobiprole group and 198 in the daptomycin group) had confirmed S. aureus bacteremia and received ceftobiprole or daptomycin (modified intention-to-treat population). A total of 132 of 189 patients (69.8%) in the ceftobiprole group and 136 of 198 patients (68.7%) in the daptomycin group had overall treatment success (adjusted difference, 2.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.1 to 11.1). Findings appeared to be consistent between the ceftobiprole and daptomycin groups in key subgroups and with respect to secondary outcomes, including mortality (9.0% and 9.1%, respectively; 95% CI, -6.2 to 5.2) and the percentage of patients with microbiologic eradication (82.0% and 77.3%; 95% CI, -2.9 to 13.0). Adverse events were reported in 121 of 191 patients (63.4%) who received ceftobiprole and 117 of 198 patients (59.1%) who received daptomycin; serious adverse events were reported in 36 patients (18.8%) and 45 patients (22.7%), respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events (primarily mild nausea) were more frequent with ceftobiprole.
Conclusions: Ceftobiprole was noninferior to daptomycin with respect to overall treatment success in patients with complicated S. aureus bacteremia. (Funded by Basilea Pharmaceutica International and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; ERADICATE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03138733.).
Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Comment in
-
Ceftobiprole for Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.N Engl J Med. 2023 Dec 28;389(26):2498. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2312883. N Engl J Med. 2023. PMID: 38157514 No abstract available.
-
Ceftobiprole for Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Reply.N Engl J Med. 2023 Dec 28;389(26):2498-2499. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2312883. N Engl J Med. 2023. PMID: 38157515 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Interventions for the eradication of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 21;7(7):CD009650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009650.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 13;12:CD009650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009650.pub5. PMID: 30030966 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Aztreonam-avibactam versus meropenem for the treatment of serious infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria (REVISIT): a descriptive, multinational, open-label, phase 3, randomised trial.Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 Feb;25(2):218-230. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00499-7. Epub 2024 Oct 7. Lancet Infect Dis. 2025. PMID: 39389071 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in patients treated with ceftobiprole: results from Phase 3 clinical trials.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Jun 3;80(6):1526-1534. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaf096. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025. PMID: 40155066 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Daptomycin for Pediatric Complex Bone and Joint Infections: Real-world Efficacy and Safety Data from a Three-year Study.Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2025 Mar 14;44(8):e291-e295. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000004804. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2025. PMID: 40106774
-
Interventions for the eradication of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in people with cystic fibrosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 13;12(12):CD009650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009650.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36511181 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Editorial: Progressing the understanding and management of bloodstream infections.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 4;12:1562934. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1562934. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 39967598 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Antibiotics daptomycin interacts with S protein of SARS-CoV-2 to promote cell invasion of Omicron (B1.1.529) pseudovirus.Virulence. 2024 Dec;15(1):2339703. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2024.2339703. Epub 2024 Apr 24. Virulence. 2024. PMID: 38576396 Free PMC article.
-
Dalbavancin for Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: The DOTS Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2025 Aug 13:e2512543. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.12543. Online ahead of print. JAMA. 2025. PMID: 40802264 Free PMC article.
-
Antibiotic Resistance to Molecules Commonly Prescribed for the Treatment of Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Positive Pathogens: What Is Relevant for the Clinician?Pathogens. 2024 Jan 19;13(1):88. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13010088. Pathogens. 2024. PMID: 38276161 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment of Complicated Gram-Positive Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis.Drugs. 2025 Feb;85(2):193-214. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02135-z. Epub 2024 Dec 25. Drugs. 2025. PMID: 39720961 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical