Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 27:25:e44886.
doi: 10.2196/44886.

Ethical and Information Governance Considerations for Promoting Digital Social Interventions in Primary Care

Georgios Dimitrios Karampatakis  1 , Helen E Wood  1 , Chris J Griffiths  1 , Nathan C Lea  2 , Richard E Ashcroft  3 , Bill Day  1 , Neil Walker  1 , Neil S Coulson  4 , Anna De Simoni  1
Affiliations

Ethical and Information Governance Considerations for Promoting Digital Social Interventions in Primary Care

Georgios Dimitrios Karampatakis et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Promoting online peer support beyond the informal sector to statutory health services requires ethical considerations and evidence-based knowledge about its impact on patients, health care professionals, and the wider health care system. Evidence on the effectiveness of digital interventions in primary care is sparse, and definitive guidance is lacking on the ethical concerns arising from the use of social media as a means for health-related interventions and research. Existing literature examining ethical issues with digital interventions in health care mainly focuses on apps, electronic health records, wearables, and telephone or video consultations, without necessarily covering digital social interventions, and does not always account for primary care settings specifically. Here we address the ethical and information governance aspects of undertaking research on the promotion of online peer support to patients by primary care clinicians, related to medical and public health ethics.

Keywords: data governance; digital health; digital intervention; digital social interventions; ethics; information governance; online health communities; peer support; primary care; social intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Panagioti M, Richardson G, Small N, Murray E, Rogers A, Kennedy A, Newman S, Bower P. Self-management support interventions to reduce health care utilisation without compromising outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:356. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-356. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6963-14... 1472-6963-14-356 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michie S, Yardley L, West R, Patrick K, Greaves F. Developing and evaluating digital interventions to promote behavior change in health and health care: recommendations resulting from an international workshop. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(6):e232. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7126. https://www.jmir.org/2017/6/e232/ v19i6e232 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Life sciences industrial strategy—a report to the government from the life sciences sector. Life Sciences Industrial Strategy Board. 2017. [2022-12-02]. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa... .
    1. Peer support: what is it and does it work? Summarising evidence from more than 1000 studies. Nesta. 2015. [2022-12-02]. https://www.nationalvoices.org.uk/sites/default/files/public/publication... .
    1. Audrain-Pontevia AF, Menvielle L, Ertz M. Effects of three antecedents of patient compliance for users of peer-to-peer online health communities: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(11):e14006. doi: 10.2196/14006. https://www.jmir.org/2019/11/e14006 v21i11e14006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed