Toxicity profiles of antibody-drug conjugates for anticancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 37756687
- PMCID: PMC10579782
- DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad069
Toxicity profiles of antibody-drug conjugates for anticancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Antibody-drug conjugates are attractive targeted agents in anticancer treatment because of their unique mechanism of action and reduced toxicity. Little is known about the spectrum of adverse events associated with antibody-drug conjugates, despite tens of clinical trials.
Methods: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials evaluating antibody-drug conjugate efficacy in anticancer treatment was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrial.gov were searched for relevant studies. Meta-analyses assessed the odds ratios (ORs) of 12 treatment-related symptoms and toxicities in patients treated with antibody-drug conjugates compared with those receiving other anticancer agents without antibody-drug conjugates. All-grade and high-grade (grade ≥3) toxicities were examined.
Results: Twenty studies involving 10 075 patients were included. Compared with control groups, antibody-drug conjugates were associated with a higher risk of all-grade fatigue (OR = 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08 to 1.45), anorexia (OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.69), nausea (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.97), and sensory neuropathy (OR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.27 to 3.76) as treatment-related symptoms. Patients treated with antibody-drug conjugates had a statistically significantly lower risk of all-grade febrile neutropenia (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.96). Conversely, they had a higher risk of thrombocytopenia (OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.00 to 4.31), increased alanine aminotransferase (OR = 2.51, 95% CI = 1.84 to 3.40), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (OR = 2.83, 95% CI = 2.04 to 3.93). Subgroup analysis showed a similar toxicity profile when comparing the solid tumors with hematologic malignancy groups and the antibody-drug conjugate vs antibody-drug conjugate plus chemotherapy groups, except for some neurologic and hematologic adverse events.
Conclusions: This comprehensive profile of adverse events associated with antibody-drug conjugate-based treatment shows an increase in various types of all-grade treatment-related symptoms and adverse events, although no increase in high-grade adverse events was seen.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr Wright has received royalties from UpToDate and research funding from Merck. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. Dr Suzuki reports receiving payment from the Japan Society for Menopause and Women’s Health (JMWH Bayer Grant 2021), from Honjo International Scholarship Foundation (Honjo-JMSA Scholarship 2022), and from Kanzawa Medical Research Foundation (Oversea Research Grant 2022).
Figures
References
-
- Chari RV. Targeted cancer therapy: conferring specificity to cytotoxic drugs. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41(1):98-107. - PubMed
-
- Birrer MJ, Moore KN, Betella I, Bates RC.. Antibody‐drug conjugate‐based therapeutics: state of the science. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(6):538-549. - PubMed
-
- Lambert JM, Berkenblit A.. Antibody-drug conjugates for cancer treatment. Annu Rev Med. 2018;69(1):191-207. - PubMed
-
- Yarden Y, Sliwkowski MX.. Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2(2):127-137. - PubMed
-
- Chau CH, Steeg PS, Figg WD.. Antibody–drug conjugates for cancer. Lancet. 2019;394(10200):793-804. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical