Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function
- PMID: 37757592
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.02768
Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function
Abstract
A dosage formula has been derived from a retrospective analysis of carboplatin pharmacokinetics in 18 patients with pretreatment glomerular filtration rates (GFR) in the range of 33 to 136 mL/min. Carboplatin plasma clearance was linearly related to GFR (r = 0.85, P less than .00001) and rearrangements of the equation describing the correlation gave the dosage formula dose (mg) = target area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) x (1.2 x GFR + 20). In a prospective clinical and pharmacokinetic study the formula was used to determine the dose required to treat 31 patients (GFR range, 33 to 135 mL/min) with 40 courses of carboplatin. The target AUC was escalated from 3 to 8 mg carboplatin/mL/min. Over this AUC range the formula accurately predicted the observed AUC (observed/predicted ratio 1.24 +/- 0.11, r = 0.886) and using these additional data, the formula was refined. Dose (mg) = target AUC x (GFR + 25) is now the recommended formula. AUC values of 4 to 6 and 6 to 8 mg/mL. min gave rise to manageable hematological toxicity in previously treated and untreated patients, respectively, and hence target AUC values of 5 and 7 mg/mL min are recommended for single-agent carboplatin in these patient groups. Pharmacokinetic modeling demonstrated that the formula was reasonably accurate regardless of whether a one- or two-compartment model most accurately described carboplatin pharmacokinetics, assuming that body size did not influence nonrenal clearance. The validity of this assumption was demonstrated in 13 patients where no correlation between surface area and nonrenal clearance was found (r = .31, P = .30). Therefore, the formula provides a simple and consistent method of determining carboplatin dose in adults. Since the measure of carboplatin exposure in the formula is AUC, and not toxicity, it will not be influenced by previous or concurrent myelosuppressive therapy or supportive measures. The formula is therefore applicable to combination and high-dose studies as well as conventional single-agent therapy, although the target AUC for carboplatin will need to be redefined for combination chemotherapy.
Republished from
-
Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function.J Clin Oncol. 1989 Nov;7(11):1748-56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.11.1748. J Clin Oncol. 1989. PMID: 2681557
Similar articles
-
Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function.J Clin Oncol. 1989 Nov;7(11):1748-56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.11.1748. J Clin Oncol. 1989. PMID: 2681557
-
Population pharmacokinetics of carboplatin, etoposide and melphalan in children: a re-evaluation of paediatric dosing formulas for carboplatin in patients with normal or mild impairment of renal function.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jan;85(1):136-146. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13774. Epub 2018 Nov 4. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019. PMID: 30261554 Free PMC article.
-
Extension of the Calvert formula to patients with severe renal insufficiency.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;76(1):53-9. doi: 10.1007/s00280-015-2769-9. Epub 2015 May 10. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2015. PMID: 25957958 Clinical Trial.
-
Carboplatin dosing for adult Japanese patients.Nagoya J Med Sci. 2014 Feb;76(1-2):1-9. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 25129986 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical pharmacokinetics and dose optimisation of carboplatin.Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Sep;33(3):161-83. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199733030-00002. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997. PMID: 9314610 Review.
Cited by
-
From Prospective Evaluation to Practice: Model-Informed Dose Optimization in Oncology.Drugs. 2025 Apr;85(4):487-503. doi: 10.1007/s40265-025-02152-6. Epub 2025 Feb 12. Drugs. 2025. PMID: 39939511 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A phase 2 study of decitabine with or without carboplatin and arsenic trioxide in patients with MDS and AML.Blood Neoplasia. 2025 Jan 23;2(2):100071. doi: 10.1016/j.bneo.2025.100071. eCollection 2025 May. Blood Neoplasia. 2025. PMID: 40453133 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Performance of Creatinine and Cystatin-Based Equations on Estimating Measured GFR in People with Hematological and Solid Cancers.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 Mar 1;20(3):358-366. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000616. Epub 2025 Feb 10. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025. PMID: 39874103
-
Real-world safety of carboplatin in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective signal detection and subgroup analysis based on the FAERS database.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 16;12:1590738. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1590738. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40589971 Free PMC article.
-
A comprehensive review on the potential of coumarin and related derivatives as multi-target therapeutic agents in the management of gynecological cancers.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 16;15:1423480. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1423480. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 39364049 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources