Exploring the Utility of Multiplex Infectious Disease Panel Testing for Diagnosis of Infection in Different Body Sites: A Joint Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and Pan American Society for Clinical Virology
- PMID: 37757952
- PMCID: PMC11702286
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.08.005
Exploring the Utility of Multiplex Infectious Disease Panel Testing for Diagnosis of Infection in Different Body Sites: A Joint Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases Society of America, and Pan American Society for Clinical Virology
Erratum in
-
Corrections.J Mol Diagn. 2025 Mar;27(3):232. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.12.004. Epub 2025 Jan 16. J Mol Diagn. 2025. PMID: 39805327 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
The use of clinical molecular diagnostic methods for detecting microbial pathogens continues to expand and, in some cases, supplant conventional identification methods in various scenarios. Analytical and clinical benefits of multiplex molecular panels for the detection of respiratory pathogens have been demonstrated in various studies. The use of these panels in managing different patient populations has been incorporated into clinical guidance documents. The Association for Molecular Pathology's Infectious Diseases Multiplex Working Group conducted a review of the current benefits and challenges to using multiplex PCR for the detection of pathogens from gastrointestinal tract, central nervous system, lower respiratory tract, and joint specimens. The Working Group also discusses future directions and novel approaches to detection of pathogens in alternate specimen types, and outlines challenges associated with implementation of these multiplex PCR panels.
Copyright © 2023 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure Statement This article represents the consensus opinion of the Infectious Diseases Multiplex Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee; all authors contributed equally. M.A.L. is employed by and owns stock options at Roche Molecular Systems. K.A. is employed by the University of North Carolina School of Medicine and has received honorarium from Cepheid. N.E.B. is employed by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and is a Clinical Advisory Board member at ArcBio and Scientific Advisory Board member at Bio-Rad Laboratories and Agena Bioscience. S.M.B.-W. is employed by the University of Southern California and has received consulting honoraria from Luminex and BioFire. J.D.B. is employed by the Children's Hospital of Los Angeles and the University of Southern California, is temporarily employed as a medical reviewer for GenMark Diagnostics, worked previously as a consultant and a member of the Expert Advisory panel for Accelerate Diagnostics, and is a current consultant for BioFire Diagnostics. A.L.G. is employed by the University of Washington Medical Center and is a recipient of research grants from Merck and Gilead and has central testing contracts with Abbott. S.N.N. is employed by and owns stock options at LabCorp Seattle. D.N. is employed by Bio-Rad Laboratories. F.N. is currently employed by Karius Inc. The remaining authors have declared no related conflicts of interests.
Similar articles
-
Comparative evaluation of the detection rate, workflow and associated costs of a multiplex PCR panel versus conventional methods in diagnosis of infectious gastroenteritis.J Med Microbiol. 2024 Feb;73(2). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001795. J Med Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 38362908
-
Viral pathogen detection using multiplex gastrointestinal molecular panels: The pros and cons of viral target inclusion.J Clin Virol. 2023 Dec;169:105612. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105612. Epub 2023 Oct 15. J Clin Virol. 2023. PMID: 37866093 Review.
-
Clinical evaluation of multiplex real-time PCR panels for rapid detection of respiratory viral infections.J Med Virol. 2012 Jan;84(1):162-9. doi: 10.1002/jmv.22186. Epub 2011 Nov 3. J Med Virol. 2012. PMID: 22052551 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of four multiplex PCR assays for the detection of viral pathogens in respiratory specimens.J Virol Methods. 2013 Aug;191(2):118-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 Apr 11. J Virol Methods. 2013. PMID: 23583489 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic syndromic multiplex approaches for gastrointestinal infections.Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul;15(7):743-757. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1899807. Epub 2021 Mar 19. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. PMID: 33682566 Review.
Cited by
-
Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing from over 15,000 Patients Identified a Broad Spectrum of Pathogens.J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Aug 23;61(8):e0185522. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01855-22. Epub 2023 Jul 13. J Clin Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 37439686 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Point-of-Care Testing on Diagnosis, Treatment, and Surveillance of Vaccine-Preventable Viral Infections.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 7;15(2):123. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15020123. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39857007 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Viral meningitis in Sub-Saharan Africa: trends in prevalence, etiologies, and diagnostic approaches.Virol J. 2025 Apr 15;22(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12985-025-02730-w. Virol J. 2025. PMID: 40234954 Free PMC article.
-
Multicentre Experience on the Diagnostic Yield of PCR Testing for Bacterial Pathogens in Sterile Site Infections.J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2025 Jan 23;10(1):78-83. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2024-0030. eCollection 2025 Mar. J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2025. PMID: 40671851 Free PMC article.
-
Analytical and clinical validation of direct detection of antimicrobial resistance markers by plasma microbial cell-free DNA sequencing.J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Oct 16;62(10):e0042524. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00425-24. Epub 2024 Aug 28. J Clin Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 39194269 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Xu M., Qin X., Astion M.L., Rutledge J.C., Simpson J., Jerome K.R., Englund J.A., Zerr D.M., Migita R.T., Rich S., Childs J.C., Cent A., Del Beccaro M.A. Implementation of FilmArray respiratory viral panel in a core laboratory improves testing turnaround time and patient care. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;139:118–123. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Rogers B.B., Shankar P., Jerris R.C., Kotzbauer D., Anderson E.J., Watson J.R., O’Brien L.A., Uwindatwa F., McNamara K., Bost J.E. Impact of a rapid respiratory panel test on patient outcomes. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139:636–641. - PubMed
-
- Brendish N.J., Malachira A.K., Armstrong L., Houghton R., Aitken S., Nyimbili E., Ewings S., Lillie P.J., Clark T.W. Routine molecular point-of-care testing for respiratory viruses in adults presenting to hospital with acute respiratory illness (ResPOC): a pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5:401–411. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hanson K.E., Azar M.M., Banerjee R., Chou A., Colgrove R.C., Ginocchio C.C., Hayden M.K., Holodiny M., Jain S., Koo S., Levy J., Timbrook T.T., Caliendo A.M. Molecular testing for acute respiratory tract infections: clinical and diagnostic recommendations from the IDSA’s diagnostics committee. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:2744–2751. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical