Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;19(2):2260038.
doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2260038. Epub 2023 Sep 27.

A qualitative study exploring the social contagion of attitudes and uptake of COVID-19 vaccinations

Affiliations

A qualitative study exploring the social contagion of attitudes and uptake of COVID-19 vaccinations

Christiana Karashiali et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Vaccination attitudes and uptake can spread within social networks. This study aims to understand the perceived social contagion mechanisms of vaccination uptake in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted following a purposive sampling of three hesitant, three anti- COVID-19 vaccine and five pro- COVID-19 vaccine (27% females). Thematic Analysis suggested two general themes reflecting the type of contagion: 1) information contagion and 2) behavior contagion. Transcending these themes was the notion of ownership of choice/decision. Almost all participants used the media and experts as the main source of information regarding vaccination. They influenced - and they were being influenced by - friends and family members with whom they share similar traits and attitudes and have a close relationship of trust and intimacy. Also, being exposed to positive attitudes and beliefs toward vaccination and COVID-19 vaccines, enhanced vaccination behaviors. However, the vaccination decision-making process was not perceived as a passive process - there was ownership over the decisions made. This study highlights the perceived mechanisms of social contagion. It also suggests that the meaning individuals pose on their social world is crucial on their decision-making. Policymakers are advised to consider including social networks of individuals and trusted sources (i.e. healthcare providers) when delivering interventions or educational campaigns on vaccinations.

Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; Vaccination; social contagion; social transmission; thematic analysis.

Plain language summary

The social contagion theory suggests that people’s attitudes and behaviors can spread from one individual to another in different types of social networks such as families, schools and communities. This study explores how this theory can be applied in vaccination for COVID-19 using a series of interviews with individuals in Cyprus that hold differing views about vaccinations. Participants were screened first on their attitudes toward vaccines and therefore purposively recruited individuals who hold positive, negative and hesitant views toward vaccines. A sample of 11 interviews were included for analysis. Study participants first provided information on their exposure to information about vaccines mainly from the media and the web and most discussed their concerns with a healthcare provider whom they consider the most trusted source of information irrespective of their personal views about vaccines. They further elaborated that other influences such as politicians were not perceived as experts. Participants were mostly influenced on their decision to vaccinate by their family and friends thus those with whom they trusted more and felt more intimate with or they share similar views with. Participants finally demonstrated that exposure to positive attitudes had an impact on themselves and contributed to vaccination. Therefore the meaning people pose on their surrounding world is of utmost importance on their decision-making. In terms of policymaking this study suggests that public health interventions could include trusted sources when delivering campaigns and interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Thematic map of themes and subthemes generated through data analysis.
None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Konstantinou P, Georgiou K, Kumar N, Kyprianidou M, Nicolaides C, Karekla M, Kassianos AP.. Transmission of vaccination attitudes and uptake based on social contagion theory: a scoping review. Vaccines. 2021 Jun 5;9(6):607. doi:10.3390/vaccines9060607. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levy DA, Nail PR. Contagion: a theoretical and empirical review and reconceptualization. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1993;119:233–13. - PubMed
    1. Christakis NA, Fowler JH, Sporns O. Social network sensors for early detection of contagious outbreaks. PloS One. 2010 Sep 15;5(9):e12948. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012948. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christakis NA, Fowler JH. Social contagion theory: examining dynamic social networks and human behavior. Stat Med. 2013 Feb 20;32(4):556–77. doi:10.1002/sim.5408. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organisation . WHO coronavirus dashboard. 2022. [accessed 2023 Jan 22]. https://covid19.who.int.

Publication types

Substances