A qualitative study exploring the social contagion of attitudes and uptake of COVID-19 vaccinations
- PMID: 37758300
- PMCID: PMC10538449
- DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2260038
A qualitative study exploring the social contagion of attitudes and uptake of COVID-19 vaccinations
Abstract
Vaccination attitudes and uptake can spread within social networks. This study aims to understand the perceived social contagion mechanisms of vaccination uptake in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Eleven semi-structured interviews were conducted following a purposive sampling of three hesitant, three anti- COVID-19 vaccine and five pro- COVID-19 vaccine (27% females). Thematic Analysis suggested two general themes reflecting the type of contagion: 1) information contagion and 2) behavior contagion. Transcending these themes was the notion of ownership of choice/decision. Almost all participants used the media and experts as the main source of information regarding vaccination. They influenced - and they were being influenced by - friends and family members with whom they share similar traits and attitudes and have a close relationship of trust and intimacy. Also, being exposed to positive attitudes and beliefs toward vaccination and COVID-19 vaccines, enhanced vaccination behaviors. However, the vaccination decision-making process was not perceived as a passive process - there was ownership over the decisions made. This study highlights the perceived mechanisms of social contagion. It also suggests that the meaning individuals pose on their social world is crucial on their decision-making. Policymakers are advised to consider including social networks of individuals and trusted sources (i.e. healthcare providers) when delivering interventions or educational campaigns on vaccinations.
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; Vaccination; social contagion; social transmission; thematic analysis.
Plain language summary
The social contagion theory suggests that people’s attitudes and behaviors can spread from one individual to another in different types of social networks such as families, schools and communities. This study explores how this theory can be applied in vaccination for COVID-19 using a series of interviews with individuals in Cyprus that hold differing views about vaccinations. Participants were screened first on their attitudes toward vaccines and therefore purposively recruited individuals who hold positive, negative and hesitant views toward vaccines. A sample of 11 interviews were included for analysis. Study participants first provided information on their exposure to information about vaccines mainly from the media and the web and most discussed their concerns with a healthcare provider whom they consider the most trusted source of information irrespective of their personal views about vaccines. They further elaborated that other influences such as politicians were not perceived as experts. Participants were mostly influenced on their decision to vaccinate by their family and friends thus those with whom they trusted more and felt more intimate with or they share similar views with. Participants finally demonstrated that exposure to positive attitudes had an impact on themselves and contributed to vaccination. Therefore the meaning people pose on their surrounding world is of utmost importance on their decision-making. In terms of policymaking this study suggests that public health interventions could include trusted sources when delivering campaigns and interventions.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Figures
Similar articles
-
Understanding the Public's Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccines in Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom: Qualitative Social Media Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 29;25:e38404. doi: 10.2196/38404. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 36812390 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 vaccine decision-making and the role of institutions across the pandemic in UK Black African and Black Caribbean communities.Vaccine. 2025 Apr 19;53:127071. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127071. Epub 2025 Apr 6. Vaccine. 2025. PMID: 40194488
-
Exploring the impact of media and information on self-reported intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19: A qualitative interview-based study.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2048623. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2048623. Epub 2022 Apr 13. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022. PMID: 35417284 Free PMC article.
-
Transmission of Vaccination Attitudes and Uptake Based on Social Contagion Theory: A Scoping Review.Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jun 5;9(6):607. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9060607. Vaccines (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34198885 Free PMC article.
-
Addressing vaccine hesitancy and resistance for COVID-19 vaccines.Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Jul;131:104241. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104241. Epub 2022 Apr 1. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022. PMID: 35489108 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Enhancing Mass Vaccination Programs with Queueing Theory and Spatial Optimization.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Jul 9:2024.06.14.24308958. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.14.24308958. medRxiv. 2024. Update in: Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 24;12:1440673. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1440673. PMID: 38947058 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Determinants of COVID-19 vaccination acceptance based on the novel Omale INDEPT FORCIS Framework and recommendations for subsequent pandemics: a qualitative study among community members in Ebonyi state, Nigeria.Int J Equity Health. 2024 Oct 28;23(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02284-3. Int J Equity Health. 2024. PMID: 39468612 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing mass vaccination programs with queueing theory and spatial optimization.Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 24;12:1440673. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1440673. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39776482 Free PMC article.
-
Don't ask "Why?": a novel approach to vaccine persuasion.CMAJ. 2024 Dec 8;196(42):E1391-E1392. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.240428. CMAJ. 2024. PMID: 39653402 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Strategies and resources used by public health units to encourage COVID-19 vaccination among priority groups: a behavioural science-informed review of three urban centres in Canada.BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21342-1. BMC Public Health. 2025. PMID: 39891139 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Levy DA, Nail PR. Contagion: a theoretical and empirical review and reconceptualization. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1993;119:233–13. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organisation . WHO coronavirus dashboard. 2022. [accessed 2023 Jan 22]. https://covid19.who.int.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical