Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 29;12(9):1686.
doi: 10.3390/antiox12091686.

LED Lights Influenced Phytochemical Contents and Biological Activities in Kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala) Microgreens

Affiliations

LED Lights Influenced Phytochemical Contents and Biological Activities in Kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala) Microgreens

Seom Lee et al. Antioxidants (Basel). .

Abstract

Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are regarded as an effective artificial light source for producing sprouts, microgreens, and baby leaves. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the influence of different LED lights (white, red, and blue) on the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (glucosinolates, carotenoids, and phenolics) and the biological effects on kale microgreens. Microgreens irradiated with white LEDs showed higher levels of carotenoids, including lutein, 13-cis-β-carotene, α-carotene, β-carotene, and 9-cis-β-carotene, than those irradiated with red or blue LEDs. These findings were consistent with higher expression levels of carotenoid biosynthetic genes (BoPDS and BoZDS) in white-irradiated kale microgreens. Similarly, microgreens irradiated with white and blue LEDs showed slightly higher levels of glucosinolates, including glucoiberin, progoitrin, sinigrin, and glucobrassicanapin, than those irradiated with red LEDs. These results agree with the high expression levels of BoMYB28-2, BoMYB28-3, and BoMYB29 in white- and blue-irradiated kale microgreens. In contrast, kale microgreens irradiated with blue LEDs contained higher levels of phenolic compounds (gallic acid, catechin, ferulic acid, sinapic acid, and quercetin). According to the total phenolic content (TPC) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) inhibition assays, the extracts of kale microgreens irradiated with blue LEDs had slightly higher antioxidant activities, and the DPPH inhibition percentage had a positive correlation with TPC in the microgreens. Furthermore, the extracts of kale microgreens irradiated with blue LEDs exhibited stronger antibacterial properties against normal pathogens and multidrug-resistant pathogens than those irradiated with white and red LEDs. These results indicate that white-LED lights are suitable for carotenoid production, whereas blue-LED lights are efficient in increasing the accumulation of phenolics and their biological activities in kale microgreens.

Keywords: LED lights; antibacterial effect; antioxidant effect; carotenoid; glucosinolate; kale microgreens; phenolics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Expression of carotenoid biosynthesis genes in kale microgreens irradiated with white-, blue-, and red-LED lights. Means with the different letters (a–c) are significantly different at p < 0.05 using DMRT.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Expression of alipathic glucosinolate biosynthesis involves transcription factors in kale microgreens irradiated with white-, blue-, and red-LED lights. Means with the different letters (a or b) are significantly different at p < 0.05 using DMRT.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Representative images showing antibacterial activities of methanol extracts of kale microgreens grown under different LED light illuminations (left, extracts of kale microgreens grown under white-LED light; middle, extracts of kale microgreens grown under blue-LED lights; right, extracts of kale microgreens grown under red-LED lights).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sikora E., Bodziarczyk I. Composition and antioxidant activity of kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala) raw and cooked. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 2012;11:239–248. - PubMed
    1. Ayaz F.A., Glew R.H., Millson M., Huang H., Chuang L., Sanz C., Hayırlıoglu-Ayaz S. Nutrient contents of kale (Brassica oleraceae L. var. acephala DC.) Food Chem. 2006;96:572–579. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.03.011. - DOI
    1. Lučić D., Pavlović I., Brkljačić L., Bogdanović S., Farkaš V., Cedilak A., Nanić L., Rubelj I., Salopek-Sondi B. Antioxidant and Antiproliferative Activities of Kale (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala DC.) and Wild Cabbage (Brassica incana Ten.) Polyphenolic Extracts. Molecules. 2023;28:1840. doi: 10.3390/molecules28041840. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. da Silva L.C.R., Azevedo A.M., Almeida A.C., da Fonseca F.S.A., Brandi I.V., Ferreira E.A., Fernandes A.C.G., Valadares N.R. Antioxidant and antimicrobial capacity of aqueous extract of kale and potential supplementation in fermented dairy beverage. Sci. Plena. 2021;17:101502. doi: 10.14808/sci.plena.2021.101502. - DOI
    1. Park C.H., Park S.-Y., Park Y.J., Kim J.K., Park S.U. Metabolite profiling and comparative analysis of secondary metabolites in Chinese cabbage, radish, and hybrid xBrassicoraphanus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020;68:13711–13719. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c04897. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources