Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 2;11(9):2447.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11092447.

The Action Potential Clamp Technique as a Tool for Risk Stratification of Sinus Bradycardia Due to Loss-of-Function Mutations in HCN4: An In Silico Exploration Based on In Vitro and In Vivo Data

Affiliations

The Action Potential Clamp Technique as a Tool for Risk Stratification of Sinus Bradycardia Due to Loss-of-Function Mutations in HCN4: An In Silico Exploration Based on In Vitro and In Vivo Data

Arie O Verkerk et al. Biomedicines. .

Abstract

These days, in vitro functional analysis of gene variants is becoming increasingly important for risk stratification of cardiac ion channelopathies. So far, such risk stratification has been applied to SCN5A, KCNQ1, and KCNH2 gene variants associated with Brugada syndrome and long QT syndrome types 1 and 2, respectively, but risk stratification of HCN4 gene variants related to sick sinus syndrome has not yet been performed. HCN4 is the gene responsible for the hyperpolarization-activated 'funny' current If, which is an important modulator of the spontaneous diastolic depolarization underlying the sinus node pacemaker activity. In the present study, we carried out a risk classification assay on those loss-of-function mutations in HCN4 for which in vivo as well as in vitro data have been published. We used the in vitro data to compute the charge carried by If (Qf) during the diastolic depolarization phase of a prerecorded human sinus node action potential waveform and assessed the extent to which this Qf predicts (1) the beating rate of the comprehensive Fabbri-Severi model of a human sinus node cell with mutation-induced changes in If and (2) the heart rate observed in patients carrying the associated mutation in HCN4. The beating rate of the model cell showed a very strong correlation with Qf from the simulated action potential clamp experiments (R2 = 0.95 under vagal tone). The clinically observed minimum or resting heart rates showed a strong correlation with Qf (R2 = 0.73 and R2 = 0.71, respectively). While a translational perspective remains to be seen, we conclude that action potential clamp on transfected cells, without the need for further voltage clamp experiments and data analysis to determine individual biophysical parameters of If, is a promising tool for risk stratification of sinus bradycardia due to loss-of-function mutations in HCN4. In combination with an If blocker, this tool may also prove useful when applied to human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) obtained from mutation carriers and non-carriers.

Keywords: HCN4 channels; action potential; cellular electrophysiology; computer simulations; human; hyperpolarization-activated current; pacemaker activity; patch clamp; sinoatrial node.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic topology of the HCN4 protein and the set of loss-of-function mutations in HCN4 associated with familial sinus bradycardia for which both clinical and in vitro data were available, requiring that these clinical data include quantitative heart rate data from at least two mutation carriers. Tetramers of HCN4 α-subunits form the cardiac ion channels that conduct the hyperpolarization-activated ‘funny’ current (If). The HCN4 protein has six transmembrane segments (S1–S6), a pore-forming loop (P), and intracellular N- and C-termini. The voltage sensor of the channel is formed by the positively charged S4 helix. The C-terminus contains the C-linker (dotted line) and the cyclic nucleotide-binding domain (CNBD), which is known to mediate cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent changes in HCN channel gating. Colored dots indicate the location of the loss-of-function mutations in the HCN4 protein of the present study. This set of mutations includes eleven substitutions (R375C, R378C, A414G, G480R, Y481H, G482R, A485V, K530N, R550C, R666Q, and S672R) and one truncation (695X).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Voltage dependence of wild type (WT; solid blue lines) and heteromeric R375C mutant (WT + R375C; orange dotted lines) HCN4 current (de)activation. (A) Steady-state activation (y). Horizontal arrow: the mutation-induced hyperpolarizing shift in half-maximum activation voltage. Vertical arrow: the mutation-induced decrease in maximally available HCN4 current. (B) Time constant of (de)activation (τy). Horizontal arrow: the mutation-induced hyperpolarizing shift in the bell-shaped curve. Upward vertical arrow: the mutation-induced decrease in the rate of (de)activation at highly negative membrane potentials. Downward vertical arrow: the mutation-induced increase in the rate of (de)activation at less negative membrane potentials.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Charge carried by If during diastolic depolarization. (A) Prerecorded AP waveform of an isolated human sinus node pacemaker cell. During the diastolic depolarization from the maximum diastolic potential (MDP) to the take-off potential (TOP), which takes 538 ms, the membrane potential (Vm) depolarizes by 23 mV. (B) Associated reconstructed WT If, which carries a charge of 1.00 pC (filled area) as an inward current during diastolic depolarization. (C) Associated reconstructed WT + R375C If, which carries a charge of 0.20 pC during diastolic depolarization. The AP waveform of panel A is a typical waveform obtained from a set of single isolated human SAN pacemaker cells [61], and the If curve of panel B is reconstructed from this typical AP waveform and the If equations of the Fabbri–Severi model [62], which are based on the If data obtained in voltage clamp experiments on the same set of single-isolated human SAN pacemaker cells [61,63].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Electrical activity of the Fabbri–Severi model of a human SAN pacemaker cell with its default ‘wild-type’ If (WT; solid blue lines) and heteromeric R375C mutant If (WT + R375C; orange dotted lines) at different levels of autonomic tone. (A) Vagal tone (simulated ACh concentration of 20 nmol/L). (B) No rate modulation (default model). (C) β-Adrenergic tone (‘High Iso’ settings of the model).
Figure 5
Figure 5
The beating rate of the Fabbri–Severi model of a human SAN pacemaker cell with its default ‘wild-type’ If (WT) and heteromeric mutant If, simulated with the settings presented in Section 3.2 as a function of Qf (Section 3.3) at different levels of autonomic tone. a If parameters are based on Milano et al. [71]. b If parameters are based on Schweizer et al. [74]. Dashed lines are linear fits.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Minimum, average, and maximum heart rates obtained during 24 h Holter recordings from heterozygous carriers of the mutations in HCN4 as indicated or from non-carriers of the same family (Table 1) as a function of Qf (Section 3.3). a If parameters are based on Milano et al. [71]. b If parameters are based on Schweizer et al. [74]. Dashed lines are linear fits.
Figure 7
Figure 7
(A) Resting heart rates and (B) maximum heart rates during exercise testing from heterozygous carriers of the mutations in HCN4 as indicated or from non-carriers of the same family (Table 2) as a function of Qf (Section 3.3). Dashed lines are linear fits.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rumi E., Cazzola M. Diagnosis, risk stratification, and response evaluation in classical myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood. 2017;129:680–692. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-10-695957. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reddy A., Sessums L., Gupta R., Jin J., Day T., Finke B., Bitton A. Risk stratification methods and provision of care management services in comprehensive primary care initiative practices. Ann. Fam. Med. 2017;15:451–454. doi: 10.1370/afm.2124. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dom Dera J. Risk stratification: A two-step process for identifying your sickest patients. Fam. Pract. Manag. 2019;26:21–26. - PubMed
    1. Girwar S.-A.M., Jabroer R., Fiocco M., Sutch S.P., Numans M.E., Bruijnzeels M.A. A systematic review of risk stratification tools internationally used in primary care settings. Health Sci. Rep. 2021;4:e329. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.329. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor L.C., Law K., Hutchinson A., Dennison R.A., Usher-Smith J.A. Acceptability of risk stratification within population-based cancer screening from the perspective of healthcare professionals: A mixed methods systematic review and recommendations to support implementation. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0279201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279201. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources