Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 7;14(9):1768.
doi: 10.3390/genes14091768.

Predicting Patterns of Distant Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients following Local Regional Therapy Using Machine Learning

Affiliations

Predicting Patterns of Distant Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients following Local Regional Therapy Using Machine Learning

Audrey Shiner et al. Genes (Basel). .

Abstract

Up to 30% of breast cancer (BC) patients will develop distant metastases (DM), for which there is no cure. Here, statistical and machine learning (ML) models were developed to estimate the risk of site-specific DM following local-regional therapy. This retrospective study cohort included 175 patients diagnosed with invasive BC who later developed DM. Clinicopathological information was collected for analysis. Outcome variables were the first site of metastasis (brain, bone or visceral) and the time interval (months) to developing DM. Multivariate statistical analysis and ML-based multivariable gradient boosting machines identified factors associated with these outcomes. Machine learning models predicted the site of DM, demonstrating an area under the curve of 0.74, 0.75, and 0.73 for brain, bone and visceral sites, respectively. Overall, most patients (57%) developed bone metastases, with increased odds associated with estrogen receptor (ER) positivity. Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) positivity and non-anthracycline chemotherapy regimens were associated with a decreased risk of bone DM, while brain metastasis was associated with ER-negativity. Furthermore, non-anthracycline chemotherapy alone was a significant predictor of visceral metastasis. Here, clinicopathologic and treatment variables used in ML prediction models predict the first site of metastasis in BC. Further validation may guide focused patient-specific surveillance practices.

Keywords: breast cancer metastasis; machine learning; metastatic patterns; prediction models.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart displaying patient inclusion/exclusion criteria. Once patients with missing data were removed from the original cohort (n = 416), the remaining patients were excluded in order of clinical, treatment and pathological data. The final cohort for our study consisted of 175 patients. Abbreviations: chemo—chemotherapy; IDC—intraductal carcinoma.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Odds ratios (OR) for bone, brain or visceral metastases according to clinicopathological characteristics. Multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the ORs for developing bone (a) or brain (b) metastasis according to clinicopathological characteristics. ER+ and N1 vs. N0 stage were significantly associated with an increased risk of bone metastasis, whereas HER2+ and “other chemo” were significantly associated with a decreased risk. ER+ was significantly associated with a decreased risk of brain metastasis. (c) ORs for developing visceral metastasis were analyzed using bivariate analysis, and no characteristics were significant. Abbreviations: chemo—chemotherapy; N0—nodal status 0 (0 positive nodes); N1—nodal status 1 (1–3 positive nodes); N2—nodal status 2 (4–9 positive nodes); N3—nodal status 3 (greater than 10 positive nodes); HER2—human epidermal growth factor 2; ER+—estrogen receptor-positive. (* indicates statistically significant, p = 0.05).

References

    1. O’Shaughnessy J. Extending Survival with Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer. Oncologist. 2005;10:20–29. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-90003-20. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022;72:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eng L.G., Dawood S., Sopik V., Haaland B., Tan P.S., Bhoo-Pathy N., Warner E., Iqbal J., Narod S.A., Dent R. Ten-year survival in women with primary stage IV breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2016;160:145–152. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3974-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zheng Y., Zhong G., Yu K., Lei K., Yang Q. Individualized Prediction of Survival Benefit From Locoregional Surgical Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020;10:148. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00148. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frank S., Carton M., Dubot C., Campone M., Pistilli B., Dalenc F., Mailliez A., Levy C., D’hondt V., Debled M., et al. Impact of age at diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer on overall survival in the real-life ESME metastatic breast cancer cohort. Breast. 2020;52:50–57. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.04.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types