Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 9;12(18):5872.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12185872.

Efficacy of a Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for the Prevention of Depression in Nonprofessional Caregivers Administered through a Smartphone App: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations

Efficacy of a Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for the Prevention of Depression in Nonprofessional Caregivers Administered through a Smartphone App: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Fernando L Vázquez et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Due to the limited availability of in-person interventions for caregivers, the development of effective programs that use new technologies to prevent depression is needed. The goal of this research was to assess the efficacy of a cognitive behavioral intervention for the prevention of depression, administered to nonprofessional caregivers through a smartphone application (app). One hundred and seventy-five caregivers were randomly assigned to either an app-based cognitive behavioral intervention (CBIA), the CBIA intervention plus a telephone conference call (CBIA + CC), or an attention control group (ACG). At post-intervention, the incidence of depression was lower in the CBIA and CBIA + CC compared to the ACG (1.7% and 0.0% vs. 7.9%, respectively). The absolute risk, relative risk, and number needed to treat compared to the ACG were 6.2%, 21.6%, and 16 for the CBIA, whilst they were 8%, 0.0%, and 13 for the CBIA + CC. Depressive symptomatology was significantly lower in the CBIA and CBIA + CC compared to the ACG (d = 0.84, Cliff's δ = 0.49; d = 1.56, Cliff's δ = 0.72), as well as in the CBIA + CC compared to the CBIA (d = 0.72, Cliff's δ = 0.44). The prevention of depression was more likely in participants who received the CBIA, and adding the conference call in the CBIA + CC group improved the likelihood of this.

Keywords: app; caregiver; cognitive behavioral; depression; prevention; randomized controlled trial; smartphone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT 2010 flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evolution of depressive symptoms in the three groups. Note: Box plot showing the evolution of depressive symptoms in the three groups. The mean and 95% confidence interval for the CES-D score are shown in a white color inside a box. The long dashed and dotted lines represent, respectively, significant differences within or between groups (***: p-value < 0.001).

References

    1. World Health Organization . International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2001.
    1. World Health Organization . World Report on Disability. WHO and The World Bank; Geneva, Switzerland: 2011.
    1. Hosseinpoor A.R., Bergen N., Kostanjsek N., Kowal P., Officer A., Chatterji S. Socio-demographic patterns of disability among older adult populations of low-income and middle-income countries: Results from World Health Survey. Int. J. Public Health. 2016;61:337–354. doi: 10.1007/s00038-015-0742-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Triantafillou J., Naiditch M., Repkova K., Stiehr K., Carretero S., Emilsson T., Vlantoni D. Informal Care in the Long-Term Care System. European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research; Athens, Greece: Vienna, Austria: 2010. [(accessed on 10 May 2023)]. European Overview Paper. Available online: https://www.euro.centre.org/downloads/detail/768.
    1. Verbakel E., Tamlagsrønning S., Winstone L., Fjær E.L., Eikemo T.A. Informal care in Europe: Findings from the European Social Survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health. Eur. J. Public Health. 2017;27:90–95. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw229. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources