Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 11;12(18):5893.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12185893.

Rest and Stress Left Atrial Dysfunction in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Affiliations

Rest and Stress Left Atrial Dysfunction in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Angela Zagatina et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: Left atrial (LA) myopathy with paroxysmal and permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequent in chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) but sometimes occult at rest and elicited by stress.

Aim: This study sought to assess LA volume and function at rest and during stress across the spectrum of AF.

Methods: In a prospective, multicenter, observational study design, we enrolled 3042 patients [age = 64 ± 12; 63.8% male] with known or suspected CCS: 2749 were in sinus rhythm (SR, Group 1); 191 in SR with a history of paroxysmal AF (Group 2); and 102 were in permanent AF (Group 3). All patients underwent stress echocardiography (SE). We measured left atrial volume index (LAVI) in all patients and LA Strain reservoir phase (LASr) in a subset of 486 patients.

Results: LAVI increased from Group 1 to 3, both at rest (Group 1 = 27.6 ± 12.2, Group 2 = 31.6 ± 12.9, Group 3 = 43.3 ± 19.7 mL/m2, p < 0.001) and at peak stress (Group 1 = 26.2 ± 12.0, Group 2 = 31.2 ± 12.2, Group 3 = 43.9 ± 19.4 mL/m2, p < 0.001). LASr progressively decreased from Group 1 to 3, both at rest (Group 1 = 26.0 ± 8.5%, Group 2 = 23.2 ± 11.2%, Group 3 = 8.5 ± 6.5%, p < 0.001) and at peak stress (Group 1 = 26.9 ± 10.1, Group 2 = 23.8 ± 11.0 Group 3 = 10.7 ± 8.1%, p < 0.001). Stress B-lines (≥2) were more frequent in AF (Group 1 = 29.7% vs. Group 2 = 35.5% vs. Group 3 = 57.4%, p < 0.001). Inducible ischemia was less frequent in SR (Group 1 = 16.1% vs. Group 2 = 24.7% vs. Group 3 = 24.5%, p = 0.001).

Conclusions: In CCS, rest and stress LA dilation and reservoir dysfunction are often present in paroxysmal and, more so, in permanent AF and are associated with more frequent inducible ischemia and pulmonary congestion during stress.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; left atrium; reservoir function; strain; stress echocardiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort Diagram Flow diagram showing how many individuals were excluded at each step (LAVI miss, LASr miss, unclear history of AF).
Figure 2
Figure 2
On the left, the normal response in a patient in SR showing a normal pattern, with small increase of LAV (48 mL rest, 54 mL stress) and increase of LASr (26% rest, 31% stress) during exercise. In the middle, a patient in SR but with a history of paroxysmal AF showing unchanged LAV (44 mL rest, 45 mL stress) and LASr decrease (29% rest, 21% stress) during exercise. On the right, a patient in permanent AF showing a near-normal LAV (74 mL rest, 59 mL stress) and severe reduction of LASr (8% rest, 11% stress) at rest and during exercise.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scattergram of the patients with LAVI and LASr data at rest (left panel) and during stress (right panel), divided according to the stressors used (black: exercise; green: vasodilator; red: dobutamine).

References

    1. Hindricks G., Potpara T., Dagres N., Arbelo E., Bax J.J., Blomström-Lundqvist C., Boriani G., Castella M., Dan G.-A., Dilaveris P.E., et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur. Heart J. 2021;42:373–498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612. Erratum in Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 507, 546–547, 4194. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shen M.J., Arora R., Jalife J. Atrial Myopathy. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2019;4:640–654. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.05.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smiseth O.A., Baron T., Marino P.N., Marwick T.H., Flachskampf F.A. Imaging of the left atrium: Pathophysiology insights and clinical utility. Eur. Heart J.-Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2021;23:2–13. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeab191. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoit B.D. Left Atrial Reservoir Strain. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img. 2022;15:392–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.10.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Negishi K. Incremental Predictive Value of Left Atrial Parameters Over Clinical Risk Scores for Subsequent Atrial Fibrillation: Function Beyond Size. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2019;12:990–992. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.03.026. - DOI - PubMed