Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 18;12(18):6032.
doi: 10.3390/jcm12186032.

Role of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocol in the Management of Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma

Affiliations

Role of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocol in the Management of Elderly Patients with Glioblastoma

Ismail Zaed et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Objective: Among the already difficult management of neuro-oncological patients, the elderly population remains vulnerable. Because of the pathology and the comorbidities, they present a significantly higher rate of medical issues related to surgical management. Despite this, the surgical option, if feasible, remains the gold standard in these patients, and an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol could improve the postoperative safety of the patients. With this purpose, we prepared this study with the aim of defining the postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS), but also of evaluating the postoperative morbidity, perioperative complications, and postoperative pain scores.

Methods: This was a retrospective, single-cohort study performed at an academic hospital (Department of Neurosurgery, Neurocenter of South Switzerland, Switzerland) on elderly patients who underwent craniotomy for glioblastoma. Patients were enrolled in a novel ERAS protocol from January 2022 to December 2022. Since this is a feasibility study and a direct comparison was not possible, we used a historical cohort of elderly patients who had undergone elective craniotomy surgery for glioblastoma as a control group.

Results: A total of 19 patients treated in our center for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) who were aged over 75 years were included in this study. Among those, seven were newly recruited patients included in the ERAS protocol, while the remaining twelve were part of a historical cohort of previously treated patients. From a statistical point of view, the two cohorts were comparable in terms of baseline demographics. In the follow-up, it was shown that in the ERAS group, there was a reduction in the use of opioids after the surgical procedures that could be seen at 30 days (36.2% vs. 71.7%, p < 0.001), but also at 3 months, after surgery (33.0% vs. 80.0%, p < 0.001). A significant difference has also been documented in terms of mobilization and ambulation: compared to the historical cohort, in the ERAS group, there was a higher rate of mobilization (60.0% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.001), but also of ambulation (36.1% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The ERAS protocol for the management of glioblastoma in elderly patients seems to be an effective option for reducing LOS in the hospital, as well as for reducing the number of days spent in the ICU, improving the general recovery of the patient, and reducing the costs associated with hospitalization.

Keywords: ERAS; elderly; enhanced recovery after surgery; glioblastoma; neurosurgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ljungqvist O., Scott M., Fearon K.C. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:292–298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br. J. Anaesth. 1997;78:606–617. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fearon K., Ljungqvist O., Von Meyenfeldt M., Revhaug A., Dejong C., Lassen K., Nygren J., Hausel J., Soop M., Andersen J., et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: A consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin. Nutr. 2005;24:466–477. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.02.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lassen K., Soop M., Nygren J., Cox P.B.W., Hendry P.O., Spies C., von Meyenfeldt M.F., Fearon K.C., Revhaug A., Norderval S., et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch. Surg. 2009;144:961–969. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.170. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coolsen M.E., Van Dam R.M., Van Der Wilt A.A., Slim K., Lassen K., Dejong C.H.C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies. World J. Surg. 2013;37:1909–1918. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2044-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources