Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug 30;13(9):1337.
doi: 10.3390/jpm13091337.

Impact of COVID-19 on Fetal Outcomes in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Impact of COVID-19 on Fetal Outcomes in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Rossella Cannarella et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a pandemic causing respiratory symptoms, taste alterations, olfactory disturbances, and cutaneous, cardiovascular, and neurological manifestations. Recently, research interest has shifted to reproductive health to understand the factors predisposing to COVID-19 infection in pregnancy, the consequences of the infection on the fetus and on the mother, and possible vertical transmission through the placenta. Pregnancy does not increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, according to studies. However, contrary to non-pregnant women, pregnancy worsens the clinical outcome of COVID-19. Studies investigating the effects of COVID-19 on pregnancy women are heterogeneous, and the results are often conflicting. Objectives: The goal of the current work was to offer a thorough and up-to-date systematic review of, and meta-analysis on, the impact of COVID-19 on ovarian function, pregnancy, and fetal outcomes. Search strategy: This meta-analysis (PROSPERO n. CRD42023456904) was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocols. The search for relevant material was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Embase databases, through to 15 December 2022. Selection criteria: Original articles on fertile pregnant women or women attempting to become pregnant, with an active case of, or history of, SARS-CoV-2 infection were included, and reproductive function was compared to that of uninfected women. Data collection and analysis: The effects of COVID-19 on female reproductive function, particularly ovarian function, the profile of female sex hormones, pregnancy outcomes and fetal outcomes were the focus of our search. Quantitative analysis was performed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software. The standard difference of the mean was calculated for the statistical comparison between cases and controls. Cochran's Q test and heterogeneity (I2) indexes were used to assess statistical heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias tests were also performed. Main Results: Twenty-eight articles met our inclusion criteria, for a total of 27,383 patients pregnant or looking to have offspring, with active or anamnestic COVID-19, and 1,583,772 uninfected control women. Our study revealed that there was no significant difference between COVID-19 patients and the control group in terms of maternal characteristics such as age, body mass index (BMI) and comorbidities that could affect pregnancy and fetal outcomes. The risk of a miscarriage or Cesarean delivery was significantly lower, while the risk of fetal death or premature delivery was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients than in the controls. None of the included studies evaluated hormonal profiles or investigated the presence of infertility. Conclusions: Maternal comorbidities, age, and BMI do not raise the risk of COVID-19. However, pregnant women with COVID-19 had a lower risk of miscarriage and Cesarean delivery, possibly because of better prenatal care and high levels of observation during labor. COVID-19 during pregnancy increases the risk of fetal death and premature delivery.

Keywords: COVID-19; SGA; birthweight; delivery; fetal death; miscarriage; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of the literature screening.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of the risk for miscarriage in patients and controls. Crovetto et al., 2021 [19]; Wang et al., 2021 [8]; Bortoletto et al., 2021 [27]; la Cour Freiesleben et al., 2021 [37].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of the risk for chorioamnionitis in patients and controls. Glynn et al., 2021 [15]; Brien et al., 2021 [20]; Bertero et al., 2021 [22]; Blasco Santana et al., 2021 [29]; Rebutini et al., 2021 [30]; Resta et al., 2021 [31]; Jaiswal et al., 2021 [32]; Patberg et al., 2021 [33].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of difference in birth weight in patients and controls. Glynn et al., 2022 [15]; Laresgoiti-Servitje et al., 2021 [23]; Tasca et al., 2021 [26]; Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi et al., 2021 [44]; Jaiswal et al., 2021 [32]; Patberg et al., 2021 [33]; Tadas et al., 2021 [36]; Taglauer et al., 2020 [40].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot of difference in pre-term delivery in patients and controls. Lankford et al., 2021 [16]; Brien et al., [20]; Gurol-Urganci et al., 2021 [21]; Laresgoiti-Servitje et al., 2021 [23]; Tasca et al., 2021 [26]; Levitan et al., 2021 [28]; Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi et al., 2021 [44]; Rebutini et al., 2021 [30]; Verma et al., 2021 [46]; Cribiù et al., 2021 [34]; Smithgall et al., 2020 [38]; Donati et al., 2020 [41].
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot of the risk for Cesarean delivery in patients and controls. Glynn et al., 2022 [15]; Crovetto et al., 2021 [19]; Brien et al., [20]; Gurol-Urganci et al., 2021 [21]; Laresgoiti-Servitje et al., 2021 [23]; Januszewski et al., 2021 [24]; Maeda et al., 2021 [25]; Tasca et al., 2021 [26]; Jang et al., 2021 [47]; Verma et al., 2021 [46]; Resta et al., 2021 [31]; Jaiswal et al., 2021 [32]; Patberg et al., 2021 [33]; Cribiù et al., 2021 [34]; Tadas et al., 2021 [36]; Smithgall et al., 2020 [38]; Donati et al., 2020 [41].
Figure 7
Figure 7
Forest plot of difference in gestational age at delivery in patients and controls. Ruggiero et al., 2021 [17]; Crovetto et al., 2021 [19]; Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi et al., 2021 [44]; Resta et al., 2021 [31]; Patberg et al., 2021 [33]; Tadas et al., 2021 [36]; Taglauer et al., 2020 [40].
Figure 8
Figure 8
Forest plot of the risk for small for gestational age in patients and controls. Glynn et al., 2022 [15]; Crovetto et al., 2021 [19]; Gurol-Urganci et al., 2021 [21]; Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi et al., 2021 [44]; Patberg et al., 2021 [33]; Debelenko et al., 2021 [35]; Gulersen et al., 2020 [39].
Figure 9
Figure 9
Forest plot of the risk for fetal death in patients and controls. Forest plot of the risk for small for fetal death in patients and controls. Lankford et al., 2021 [16]; DeSisto et al., 2021 [18]; Crovetto et al., 2021 [19]; Gurol-Urganci et al., 2021 [21]; Laresgoiti-Servitje et al., 2021 [23]; Jaiswal et al., 2021 [32]; Debelenko et al., 2021 [35]; Tadas et al., 2021 [36].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chatterjee P., Nagi N., Agarwal A., Das B., Banerjee S., Sarkar S., Gupta N., Gangakhedkar R. The 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Review of the Current Evidence. Indian J. Med. Res. 2020;151:147. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_519_20. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO . Coronavirus Disease 2019 (2019-NCOV) Situation Report—11. Volume 31. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2020. pp. 1–7.
    1. WHO . World Health Organization (WHO): Situation Report-26. World Health Organization (WHO); Geneva, Switzerland: 2016.
    1. Heymann D.L., Shindo N. COVID-19: What Is next for Public Health. Lancet. 2020;395:10224. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30374-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ochani R., Asad A., Yasmin F., Shaikh S., Khalid H., Batra S., Sohail M.R., Mahmood S.F., Ochani R., Hussham Arshad M., et al. COVID-19 pandemic: From origins to outcomes. A comprehensive review of viral pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnostic evaluation, and management. Infez. Med. 2021;29:20–36. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources