The Importance of Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Measurement, as Highlighted by the Correlation with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in an Untreated Hypertensive Population
- PMID: 37763755
- PMCID: PMC10537443
- DOI: 10.3390/medicina59091636
The Importance of Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Measurement, as Highlighted by the Correlation with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in an Untreated Hypertensive Population
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Hypertensive heart disease, especially left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), is considered to be one of the main types hypertension-mediated organ damage. Hence, the purpose of this study was to examine which method of measuring BP (office BP measurement (OBPM), 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), or home BP monitoring (HBPM)), can be better correlated with echocardiographic LVH in the untreated hypertensive population. Materials and Methods: This study's population consisted of 202 patients 58 ± 15 years old (40.8% males). All patients reported elevated home BP measurements for at least 3 months, but they had never been treated before for hypertension. Office and out-of-office BP measurements, including ABPM on a usual working day and seven-day HBPM, as well as 2D echocardiography, were performed. Results: In the univariate analysis, LVH was associated (p < 0.05) with a mean 24 h systolic BP (OR: 1.93, CI: 1.29-2.91), a mean 24 h diastolic BP (OR: 1.30, CI: 1.16-1.80), ambulatory daytime systolic (OR: 1.11, CI:1.01-1.82) and diastolic BP (OR: 1.13, CI:1.09-1.17), ambulatory nighttime systolic BP (OR: 2.11, CI: 1.04-4.31), and mean home systolic BP (OR: 1.05, CI:1.01-1.12). Pearson's correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between the LV mass index and the mean 24 h systolic BP (r = 0.58, p < 0.05), daytime systolic BP (r = 0.59, p < 0.05), and nighttime systolic BP (r = 0.57, p < 0.05). Most of the population with confirmed LVH presented confirmed hypertension (based on ABPM, 48.1% or HBPM, 40%). The second most dominant phenotype was masked hypertension (ABPM, 32.7% and HBPM, 23.7%). The majority (59.3%) had non-dipping status, 20.4% had a reverse dipping pattern, 13% had a dipping pattern, and only 7.3% had extreme dipping BP. Conclusions: Out-of-office BP measurement devices seemed to be superior compared to in-office. This advantage is highlighted by better correlations in the identification of LVH as well as the diagnosis of masked hypertension, a condition also highly correlated with LVH.
Keywords: blood pressure; dipping status; hypertension; left ventricular hypertrophy; phenotypes.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure monitoring: correlation between blood pressure variability and left ventricular hypertrophy in untreated hypertensive patients.G Ital Cardiol. 1998 Jan;28(1):38-44. G Ital Cardiol. 1998. PMID: 9493044
-
Office or home versus 24-h blood pressure measurement in stable kidney transplant recipients.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024 Oct 30;39(11):1890-1899. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfae076. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024. PMID: 38549427
-
Blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy in patients on different peritoneal dialysis regimens.Perit Dial Int. 2001 Jan-Feb;21(1):36-42. Perit Dial Int. 2001. PMID: 11280494
-
Does This Adult Patient Have Hypertension?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review.JAMA. 2021 Jul 27;326(4):339-347. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4533. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 34313682
-
Status of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and home blood pressure monitoring for the diagnosis and management of hypertension in the US: an up-to-date review.Hypertens Res. 2023 Mar;46(3):620-629. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-01137-2. Epub 2023 Jan 5. Hypertens Res. 2023. PMID: 36604475 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Arterial Stiffness: A Strong Determinant of Abnormal Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in an Untreated Hypertensive Population.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2025 Apr 24;21:269-278. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S507356. eCollection 2025. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2025. PMID: 40297797 Free PMC article.
-
Ambulatory Blood Pressure Phenotypes, Arterial Stiffness, and Cardiac Remodeling.Am J Hypertens. 2024 Nov 15;37(12):978-986. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpae106. Am J Hypertens. 2024. PMID: 39113541 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Williams B., Mancia G., Spiering W., Agabiti Rosei E., Azizi M., Burnier M., Clement D.L., Coca A., de Simone G., Dominiczak A., et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J. Hypertens. 2018;36:1953–2041. doi: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000001940. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Perrone-Filardi P., Coca A., Galderisi M., Paolillo S., Alpendurada F., de Simone G., Donal E., Kahan T., Mancia G., Redon J., et al. Non-invasive cardiovascular imaging for evaluating subclinical target organ damage in hypertensive patients: A consensus paper from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), the European Society of Cardiology Council on Hypertension, and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2017;18:945–960. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jex094. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sinha M.D., Azukaitis K., Sladowska-Kozłowska J., Bårdsen T., Merkevicius K., Karlsen Sletten I.S., Obrycki Ł., Pac M., Fernández-Aranda F., Bjelakovic B., et al. Prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in children and young people with primary hypertension: Meta-analysis and meta-regression. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022;9:993513. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.993513. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical