Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 15;11(9):2321.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11092321.

The Potential of Digested Sludge-Assimilating Microflora for Biogas Production from Food Processing Wastes

Affiliations

The Potential of Digested Sludge-Assimilating Microflora for Biogas Production from Food Processing Wastes

Sato Hasaka et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

Food processing wastes (FPWs) are residues generated in food manufacturing, and their composition varies depending on the type of food product being manufactured. Therefore, selecting and acclimatizing seed microflora during the initiation of biogas production is crucial for optimal outcomes. The present study examined the biogas production capabilities of digested sludge-assimilating and biogas-yielding soil (DABYS) and enteric (DABYE) microflorae when used as seed cultures for biogas production from FPWs. After subculturing and feeding these microbial seeds with various FPWs, we assessed their biogas-producing abilities. The subcultures produced biogas from many FPWs, except orange peel, suggesting that the heterogeneity of the bacterial members in the seed microflora facilitates quick adaptation to FPWs. Microflorae fed with animal-derived FPWs contained several methanogenic archaeal families and produced methane. In contrast, microflorae fed with vegetable-, fruit-, and crop-derived FPWs generated hydrogen, and methanogenic archaeal populations were diminished by repeated subculturing. The subcultured microflorae appear to hydrolyze carbohydrates and protein in FPWs using cellulase, pectinase, or protease. Despite needing enhancements in biogas yield for future industrial scale-up, the DABYS and DABYE microflorae demonstrate robust adaptability to various FPWs.

Keywords: anaerobic digestion; cellulase; food waste recycling; hydrogen; methane; pectinase; protease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) band patterns of eubacterial members from subcultured microflorae originating from DABYS-A (a), DABYS-B (b), DABYE-G (c), DABYE-S (d), and DABYE-R (e) seed microflorae. The data display patterns for the 10th subculture fed with FPWs, except for the third subculture fed with orange peel, along with their originating seed cultures. Green, blue, purple, red, orange, and pink arrowheads indicate major characteristic amplicons for the V6–V8 region of the 16S rRNA genes of the Clostridiaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonadaceae, Bacillaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Oscillospiraceae families, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) band patterns of methanogen members from subcultured microflorae originating from DABYS-A (a), DABYS-B (b), DABYE-G (c), DABYE-S (d), and DABYE-R (e) seed microflorae. The data display patterns for the 10th subculture fed with FPWs, except for the third subculture fed with orange peel, along with their originating seed cultures. Green, blue, and white arrowheads indicate characteristic amplicons for the V3 region of the 16S rRNA genes of Methanobacteriaceae, Methanosarcinaceae, and unidentified archaeal families, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cellulase, pectinase, and protease activities of the subcultures originating from DABYS-A (a), DABYS-B (b), DABYE-G (c), DABYE-S (d), and DABYE-R (e) seed microflorae. The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of independent triplicates. The blue-, green-, and orange-colored letters on the columns indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 (Student’s t-test) in cellulase, pectinase, and protease activity, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. UNEP . Food Waste Index Report 2021. UNEP; Nairobi, Kenya: 2021. [(accessed on 25 July 2023)]. Food waste amounts: Measured estimates and extrapolations; pp. 54–72. Available online: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/unep-food-waste-index-report-2021.
    1. FAO . The State of Food and Agriculture. FAO; Rome, Italy: 2019. [(accessed on 25 July 2023)]. Food Loss and Waste—Framing the Issues; pp. 1–19. Available online: https://www.fao.org/3/ca6030en/ca6030en.pdf.
    1. Zhang C., Kang X., Wang F., Tian Y., Liu T., Su Y., Qian T., Zhang Y. Valorization of food waste for cost-effective reducing sugar recovery in a two-stage enzymatic hydrolysis platform. Energy. 2020;208:118379. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118379. - DOI
    1. Ali A., Bux Mahar R., Panhwar S., Ahmed Keerio H., Hussain Khokhar N., Suja F., Rundong L. Generation of green renewable energy through anaerobic digestion technology (ADT): Technical insights review. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 2023;14:663–686. doi: 10.1007/s12649-022-02001-7. - DOI
    1. Ferdeș M., Zăbavă B.Ș., Paraschiv G., Ionescu M., Dincă M.N., Moiceanu G. Food waste management for biogas production in the context of sustainable development. Energies. 2022;15:6268. doi: 10.3390/en15176268. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources