Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 19;28(18):6692.
doi: 10.3390/molecules28186692.

Construction and Evaluation of Alginate Dialdehyde Grafted RGD Derivatives/Polyvinyl Alcohol/Cellulose Nanocrystals IPN Composite Hydrogels

Affiliations

Construction and Evaluation of Alginate Dialdehyde Grafted RGD Derivatives/Polyvinyl Alcohol/Cellulose Nanocrystals IPN Composite Hydrogels

Hongcai Wang et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

To enhance the mechanical strength and cell adhesion of alginate hydrogel, making it satisfy the requirements of an ideal tissue engineering scaffold, the grafting of Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) polypeptide sequence onto the alginate molecular chain was conducted by oxidation of sodium periodate and subsequent reduction amination of 2-methylpyridine borane complex (2-PBC) to synthesize alginate dialdehyde grafted RGD derivatives (ADA-RGD) with good cellular affinity. The interpenetrating network (IPN) composite hydrogels of alginate/polyvinyl alcohol/cellulose nanocrystals (ALG/PVA/CNCs) were fabricated through a physical mixture of ion cross-linking of sodium alginate (SA) with hydroxyapatite/D-glucono-δ-lactone (HAP/GDL), and physical cross-linking of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) by a freezing/thawing method, using cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) as the reinforcement agent. The effects of the addition of CNCs and different contents of PVA on the morphology, thermal stability, mechanical properties, swelling, biodegradability, and cell compatibility of the IPN composite hydrogels were investigated, and the effect of RGD grafting on the biological properties of the IPN composite hydrogels was also studied. The resultant IPN ALG/PVA/CNCs composite hydrogels exhibited good pore structure and regular 3D morphology, whose pore size and porosity could be regulated by adjusting PVA content and the addition of CNCs. By increasing the PVA content, the number of physical cross-linking points in PVA increased, resulting in greater stress support for the IPN composite hydrogels of ALG/PVA/CNCs and consequently improving their mechanical characteristics. The creation of the IPN ALG/PVA/CNCs composite hydrogels' physical cross-linking network through intramolecular or intermolecular hydrogen bonding led to improved thermal resistance and reduced swelling and biodegradation rate. Conversely, the ADA-RGD/PVA/CNCs IPN composite hydrogels exhibited a quicker degradation rate, attributed to the elimination of ADA-RGD by alkali. The results of the in vitro cytocompatibility showed that ALG/0.5PVA/0.3%CNCs and ADA-RGD/PVA/0.3%CNCs composite hydrogels showed better proliferative activity in comparison with other composite hydrogels, while ALG/PVA/0.3%CNCs and ADA-RGD/PVA/0.3%CNCs composite hydrogels displayed obvious proliferation effects, indicating that PVA, CNCs, and ADA-RGD with good biocompatibility were conducive to cell proliferation and differentiation for the IPN composite hydrogels.

Keywords: alginate; cellular adhesion; interpenetrating network composite hydrogels; tissue engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
FT-IR spectra of (a) SA, (b) ADA, and (c) ADA-RGD.
Figure 2
Figure 2
1H NMR spectra of (a) ADA and (b) ADA-RGD.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Physical images of pure (a) ALG hydrogel and (b) ADA-RGD/PVA/CNCs composite hydrogels.
Figure 4
Figure 4
SEM images of (a) ALG hydrogel, (b) ALG/0.5PVA/0.3%CNCs, (c) ALG/PVA/0.3%CNCs, and (d) ADA-RGD/PVA/0.3%CNCs composite hydrogels.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) FT-IR spectra of (a) SA, (b) PVA, and (c) CNCs; (B) FT-IR spectra of (a) ALG hydrogel, (b) ALG/0.5PVA/0.3%CNCs, (c) ALG/PVA/0.3%CNCs and (d) ADA-RGD/PVA/0.3%CNCs composite hydrogels.
Figure 6
Figure 6
X-ray diffractions of (a) ALG hydrogel, (b) ALG/0.5PVA/0.3%CNCs, (c) ALG/PVA/0.3%CNCs, and (d) ADA-RGD/PVA/0.3%CNCs composite hydrogels.
Figure 7
Figure 7
TGA curves of (a) ALG hydrogel, (b) ALG/0.5PVA/0.3%CNCs, (c) ALG/PVA/0.3%CNCs, and (d) ADA-RGD/PVA/0.3%CNCs composite hydrogels.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Compressive strengths of (a) ALG hydrogel, (b) ALG/0.5PVA/0.3%CNCs, (c) ALG/PVA/0.3%CNCs, and (d) ADA-RGD/PVA/0.3%CNCs composite hydrogels. * denotes p < 0.05, indicating highly significant difference.
Figure 9
Figure 9
(A) Swelling ratio and (B) biodegradation ratio of ALG hydrogel, ALG/0.5PVA/0.3%CNCs, ALG/PVA/0.3%CNCs, and ADA-RGD/PVA/0.3%CNCs composite hydrogels.
Figure 10
Figure 10
SEM images of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on (a) ALG hydrogel, (b) ALG/0.5PVA/0.3%CNCs, (c) ALG/PVA/0.3%CNCs, and (d) ADA-RGD/PVA/0.3%CNCs composite hydrogels for 2 d.
Figure 11
Figure 11
(A) Cell proliferation viability and (B) cell differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured on (a) ALG hydrogel, (b) ALG/0.5PVA/0.3%CNCs, (c) ALG/PVA/0.3%CNCs, and (d) ADA-RGD/PVA/0.3%CNCs composite hydrogels for 2 d and 7 d. * denotes p < 0.05, indicating highly significant difference.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Synthesis route of ADA-RGD.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Collins M.N., Ren G., Young K., Pina S., Reis R.L., Oliveira J.M. Scaffold fabrication technologies and structure/function properties in bone tissue engineering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021;31:2010609. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202010609. - DOI
    1. Yu X., Bellamkonda R.V. Tissue-engineered scaffolds are effective alternatives to autografts for bridging peripheral nerve gaps. Tissue Eng. 2003;9:421–430. doi: 10.1089/107632703322066606. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee K.Y., Mooney D.J. Alginate: Properties and biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012;37:106–126. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.06.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zeng J.-H., Liu S.-W., Xiong L., Qiu P., Ding L.-H., Xiong S.-L., Li J.-T., Liao X.-G., Tang Z.-M. Scaffolds for the repair of bone defects in clinical studies: A systematic review. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2018;13:33. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0724-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li L., Lu H., Zhao Y., Luo J., Yang L., Liu W., He Q. Functionalized cell-free scaffolds for bone defect repair inspired by self-healing of bone fractures: A review and new perspectives. Mat. Sci. Eng. C. 2019;98:1241–1251. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.075. - DOI - PubMed