Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;79(1):128-141.
doi: 10.1111/all.15891. Epub 2023 Sep 27.

Household laundry detergents disrupt barrier integrity and induce inflammation in mouse and human skin

Arturo O Rinaldi  1 , Manru Li  1 , Elena Barletta  1 , Paolo D'Avino  1 , Duygu Yazici  1 , Yagiz Pat  1 , Siobhan Ward  1   2 , Daniel Burla  1 , Ge Tan  1 , Nima Askary  3 , Rasmus Larsson  3 , Jeremy Bost  3 , Huseyn Babayev  1 , Raja Dhir  4 , Nicolas Gaudenzio  5   6 , Mubeccel Akdis  1 , Kari Nadeau  7 , Cezmi A Akdis  1   2 , Yasutaka Mitamura  1
Affiliations

Household laundry detergents disrupt barrier integrity and induce inflammation in mouse and human skin

Arturo O Rinaldi et al. Allergy. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Epithelial barrier impairment is associated with many skin and mucosal inflammatory disorders. Laundry detergents have been demonstrated to affect epithelial barrier function in vitro using air-liquid interface cultures of human epithelial cells.

Methods: Back skin of C57BL/6 mice was treated with two household laundry detergents at several dilutions. Barrier function was assessed by electric impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurements after the 4 h of treatments with detergents. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and targeted multiplex proteomics analyses in skin biopsy samples were performed. The 6-h treatment effect of laundry detergent and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was investigated on ex vivo human skin.

Results: Detergent-treated skin showed a significant EIS reduction and TEWL increase compared to untreated skin, with a relatively higher sensitivity and dose-response in EIS. The RNA-seq showed the reduction of the expression of several genes essential for skin barrier integrity, such as tight junctions and adherens junction proteins. In contrast, keratinization, lipid metabolic processes, and epidermal cell differentiation were upregulated. Proteomics analysis showed that the detergents treatment generally downregulated cell adhesion-related proteins, such as epithelial cell adhesion molecule and contactin-1, and upregulated proinflammatory proteins, such as interleukin 6 and interleukin 1 beta. Both detergent and SDS led to a significant decrease in EIS values in the ex vivo human skin model.

Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that laundry detergents and its main component, SDS impaired the epidermal barrier in vivo and ex vivo human skin. Daily detergent exposure may cause skin barrier disruption and may contribute to the development of atopic diseases.

Keywords: electrical impedance spectroscopy; epithelial barrier; ex vivo human skin; laundry detergents; skin inflammation; transepidermal water loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. De Benedetto A, Rafaels NM, McGirt LY, et al. Tight junction defects in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(3):773-786.
    1. Mitamura Y, Nunomura S, Nanri Y, et al. The IL-13/periostin/IL-24 pathway causes epidermal barrier dysfunction in allergic skin inflammation. Allergy. 2018;73:1881-1891.
    1. Simon D, Page B, Vogel M, et al. Evidence of an abnormal epithelial barrier in active, untreated and corticosteroid-treated eosinophilic esophagitis. Allergy. 2018;73(1):239-247.
    1. Soyka MB, Wawrzyniak P, Eiwegger T, et al. Defective epithelial barrier in chronic rhinosinusitis: the regulation of tight junctions by IFN-γ and IL-4. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130(5):1087-1096.e10.
    1. Tamari M, Tanaka S, Hirota T. Genome-wide association studies of allergic diseases. Allergol Int. 2013;62(1):21-28.

Publication types