Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 20:26:100593.
doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100593. eCollection 2023 Oct.

Performance of cervical cytology and HPV testing for primary cervical cancer screening in Latin America: an analysis within the ESTAMPA study

Collaborators, Affiliations

Performance of cervical cytology and HPV testing for primary cervical cancer screening in Latin America: an analysis within the ESTAMPA study

Arianis Tatiana Ramírez et al. Lancet Reg Health Am. .

Abstract

Background: Cervical cytology remains widely used as the initial tool in cervical cancer screening worldwide. WHO guidelines recommend replacing cytology with primary HPV testing to reach cervical cancer elimination goals. We assessed the performance of cytology and high-risk HPV testing to detect cervical precancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) among women aged 30-64 years participating in the ESTAMPA study.

Methods: Women were screened with cytology and HPV across ESTAMPA study centres in Latin America. Screen-positives were referred to colposcopy with biopsy collection and treatment as needed. Those with no evident precancer were recalled at 18-months for a second HPV test to complete disease ascertainment. Performance indicators for cytology and HPV to detect CIN3+ were estimated.

Findings: 30,606 participants with available cytology and HPV results were included in the analysis. A total of 440 histologically confirmed CIN3s and 30 cancers were diagnosed. Cytology sensitivity for CIN3+ was 48.5% (95% CI: 44.0-53.0), whereas HPV testing had a sensitivity of 98.1% (95% CI: 96.3-96.7). Specificity was 96.5% (95% CI: 96.3-96.7) using cytology and 88.7% (95% CI: 88.3-89.0) with HPV. Performance estimates varied substantially by study centre for cytology (ranging from 32.1% to 87.5% for sensitivity and from 89.2% to 99.5% for specificity) while for HPV results were more consistent across sites (96.7%-100% and 83.6-90.8%, respectively).

Interpretation: The limited and highly variable sensitivity of cytology strongly supports transition to the more robust and reproducible HPV-based cervical screening to ensure progress towards global cervical cancer elimination targets in Latin America.

Funding: IARC/WHO, UNDP, HRP/WHO, NCI and local funders.

Keywords: Cervical cytology; ESTAMPA; HPV testing; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study population. ESTAMPA participants recruited between December 2012 and December 2021.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
HPV prevalence by cytologic results and age.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Performance Forest plots of cytology (a) and HPV testing (b) for CIN3+ detection for 11 study centres.

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walboomers J.M., Jacobs M.V., Manos M.M., et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999;189(1):12–19. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>3.0.CO;2-F. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Organization WH . 2020. Launch of the global strategy to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer.https://www.who.int/news-room/events/detail/2020/11/17/default-calendar/...
    1. Quinn M., Babb P., Jones J., Allen E. Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics. BMJ. 1999;318(7188):904–908. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.904. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murillo R., Wiesner C., Cendales R., Piñeros M., Tovar S. Comprehensive evaluation of cervical cancer screening programs: the case of Colombia. Salud Publica Mex. 2011;53(6):469–477. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources