Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 19:2023:8834443.
doi: 10.1155/2023/8834443. eCollection 2023.

Rheumatic Heart Disease in East Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Rheumatic Heart Disease in East Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Guesh Mebrahtom et al. Int J Rheumatol. .

Abstract

Background: Despite being a grave problem, there is little information on rheumatic heart disease's prevalence in East Africa. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the pooled prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in East Africa.

Materials and methods: A computerized systematic search of using multiple database searching engines was performed in search of relevant English articles from the inception of the databases to December 2019. It was done in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) standard. The funnel plot was used to assess publication bias. R and RStudio for Windows were used for all statistical analysis. The random-effect model was used for calculating the pooled estimate of the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease.

Results: The database search retrieved 1073 papers, and 80 articles (78 cross-sectional and two cohort study designs) with a total of 184575 individuals were found to be appropriate for the review. In East Africa, the overall prevalence of rheumatic heart disease was 14.67% (95% CI: 13.99% to 15.35%). In Ethiopia, Uganda, Tanzania, and Sudan, respectively, the subgroup analysis of rheumatic heart disease pooled prevalence was 22% (95% CI: 13% to 36%), 11% (95%t CI: 5% to 20%), 9% (95%t CI: 5% to 16%), and 3% (95%t CI: 1% to 10%), while the pooled prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in adults was 20% (95% CI: 12% to 30%), and in children, it was 4% (95% CI: 2% to 8%).

Conclusions: From this report, the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in East Africa is very high, affecting about one in seven people. Therefore, future strategies should emphasize preventive measures at appropriate times to minimize the burden of this type of preventable heart disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart diagram showing the selection of articles for systemic review and meta-analysis of rheumatic heart disease in East Africa, 2020.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Trend of rheumatic heart disease pooled prevalence in East Africa.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of rheumatic heart disease prevalence in East Africa from 1960 to 2000.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of the prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in East Africa from 2001 to 2010.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Funnel plot indicating the presence of publication bias.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot of the pooled prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in Ethiopia.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Forest plot of the pooled prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in Sudan.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Forest plot of the pooled prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in Uganda.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Forest plot of the pooled prevalence of rheumatic heart disease in Tanzania.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Forest plot of the pooled prevalence of rheumatic heart disease among adults in East Africa.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Forest plot of the pooled prevalence of rheumatic heart disease among children in East Africa.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lozano R., Naghavi M., Foreman K., et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet . 2012;380(9859):2095–2128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roberts K., Colquhoun S., Steer A., Reményi B., Carapetis J. Screening for rheumatic heart disease: current approaches and controversies. Nature Reviews Cardiology . 2013;10(1):49–58. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2012.157. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. The Current Evidence for the Burden of Group A Streptococcal Diseases . World Health Organization; 2005.
    1. Vos T., Barber R. M., Bell B., et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet . 2015;386(9995):743–800. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Irlam J., Mayosi B. M., Engel M., Gaziano T. A. Primary prevention of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease with penicillin in South African children with pharyngitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes . 2013;6(3):343–351. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000032. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources