Comparison of Intrathecal Chloroprocaine With Bupivacaine in Short Gynecological Procedures: A Randomized Double-Blind Study
- PMID: 37767250
- PMCID: PMC10520744
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44187
Comparison of Intrathecal Chloroprocaine With Bupivacaine in Short Gynecological Procedures: A Randomized Double-Blind Study
Abstract
Background Neuraxial anesthesia, compared to general anesthesia, offers better patient comfort, early ambulation, and discharge with excellent post-operative pain relief for short gynecological procedures. Recently chloroprocaine, a short-acting local anesthetic agent became available for intrathecal use. This study aimed to compare intrathecal chloroprocaine with bupivacaine in short gynecological procedures. Methodology Consecutive patients undergoing short gynecological procedures, patients belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) I and II, between 18 and 60 years of age, and patients with a height between 150 cm and 180 cm were included in the study. Randomization was done using a computer-generated random number table. Patients were allocated to one of the two study groups. Group B received 4 mL of isobaric bupivacaine (0.25%) 10 mg intrathecal, and Group C received 4 mL of isobaric chloroprocaine (1%) 40 mg intrathecal. The primary outcome criteria were time to ambulation and discharge readiness. The secondary outcome criteria were onset, duration, and intensity of sensory and motor blockade, time to voiding, and any adverse effects. Results Patients receiving chloroprocaine had a significantly (p=0.001) faster time (158±31 min) to ambulation compared to bupivacaine (241±23 min). The regression of sensory blockade was substantially faster (p=0.001) with chloroprocaine (60±13 min) than with bupivacaine (94±24 min). Mean time to motor onset was significantly (p=0.05) faster in chloroprocaine (8±3 min) than bupivacaine (12±3 min) group. Significantly faster (p=0.001) recovery of motor blockade was observed with chloroprocaine (130±32 min) than bupivacaine (211±22 min). The time to first voiding was also significantly earlier with stable hemodynamics and no adverse effects in chloroprocaine group. Conclusion Intrathecal chloroprocaine may be an attractive alternative and is superior to isobaric bupivacaine as it provides early ambulation and discharge readiness for daycare anesthesia in short gynecological procedures.
Keywords: 0.25% bupivacaine; day case surgery; gynecology surgery; intrathecal chloroprocaine; spinal anesthesia.
Copyright © 2023, Khurana et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A Comparative Study of Isobaric 1% Chloroprocaine With 0.5% Isobaric Bupivacaine for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy Under Spinal Anaesthesia: A Prospective Randomised Study.Cureus. 2022 Apr 30;14(4):e24633. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24633. eCollection 2022 Apr. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35666697 Free PMC article.
-
Intrathecal 2-Chloroprocaine 3% Versus Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.75% for Cervical Cerclage: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.Anesth Analg. 2022 Mar 1;134(3):624-632. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005653. Anesth Analg. 2022. PMID: 34153006 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized Controlled Study Comparing 2-Chloroprocaine and Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Gynecological Surgeries.Anesth Essays Res. 2022 Jan-Mar;16(1):12-16. doi: 10.4103/aer.aer_20_22. Epub 2022 Jun 14. Anesth Essays Res. 2022. PMID: 36249147 Free PMC article.
-
Does spinal chloroprocaine pharmacokinetic profile actually translate into a clinical advantage in terms of clinical outcomes when compared to low-dose spinal bupivacaine? A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Clin Anesth. 2019 Feb;52:99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 18. J Clin Anesth. 2019. PMID: 30237085
-
Optimal local anesthetic for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing ambulatory non-arthroplasty surgery: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Can J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;72(4):550-566. doi: 10.1007/s12630-025-02924-4. Epub 2025 Apr 8. Can J Anaesth. 2025. PMID: 40199797 English.
References
-
- Use of spinal anaesthesia in day surgery. Korhonen AM. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19:612–616. - PubMed
-
- Neuraxial anesthesia for outpatients. Alley EA, Mulory MF. Anesthesiol Clin. 2014;32:357–369. - PubMed
-
- The use of 2-chloroprocaine for spinal anaesthesia. Goldblum E, Atchabahian A. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57:545–552. - PubMed
-
- Comparison of bupivacaine and 2-chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia for outpatient surgery: a double-blind randomized trial. Lacasse MA, Roy JD, Forget J, et al. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58:384–391. - PubMed
-
- Intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine vs. 0.5% bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: a prospective, observer-blinded, randomised, controlled trial. Camponovo C, Wulf H, Ghisi D, et al. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58:560–566. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources