Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 28:7:e44696.
doi: 10.2196/44696.

Health Care Providers' Readiness to Adopt an Interactive 3D Web App in Consultations About Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Qualitative Evaluation of a Prototype

Affiliations

Health Care Providers' Readiness to Adopt an Interactive 3D Web App in Consultations About Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Qualitative Evaluation of a Prototype

Olivia May Holuszko et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive and appropriate health care provision to women and girls with female genital mutilation or cutting (FGM/C) is lacking. Use of visuals in health care provider (HCP) consultations facilitates the communication of health information and its comprehension by patients. A web app featuring a 3D visualization of the genitourinary anatomy was developed to support HCPs in conferring clinical information about FGM/C to patients.

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore HCP perspectives on the use of visuals in discussion about FGM/C with their patients as well as to obtain their feedback on whether an interactive 3D web app showing the genitourinary anatomy would be helpful in patient consultations about FGM/C, identifying key features that are relevant to their clinical practice.

Methods: We evaluated the web app through a semistructured interview protocol with seven HCPs from various disciplines experienced in care for women and girls with FGM/C in migration-destination settings. Interviews were audio- and video-recorded for transcription, and were then analyzed thematically for contextualized data regarding HCPs' willingness to use a 3D web app visualizing anatomy in FGM/C consultations with patients.

Results: All but one of the seven participants expressed keen interest in using this web app and its 3D visuals of anatomy in FGM/C consultations with patients. Participants shared the common contexts for the use of visuals in health care for FGM/C and the concepts they are used to support, such as to help describe a patient's genitals after FGM/C and reinforce an understanding of clitoral anatomy, to illustrate the process of defibulation, or to explain the physiological effects of FGM/C. Participants also highlighted the benefit of using visuals that patients can relate to, expressing approval for the ability to customize the vulva by FGM/C subtype, skin tone, and complexity of the visual shown in the web app. Despite critiques that the visualization may serve to perpetuate idealistic standards for how a vulva should look, participants largely agreed on the web app's perceived usefulness to clinical practice and beyond.

Conclusions: Evaluation of the web app developed in this study identified that digital tools with 3D models of the genitourinary anatomy that are accessible, informative, and customizable to any specific patient are likely to aid HCPs in communicating clinical information about FGM/C in consultations. Universal access to the web app may be particularly useful for HCPs with less experience in FGM/C. The app also prompts options for applications such as for personal use, in medical education, in patient medical records, or in legal settings. Further qualitative research with patients is required to confirm that adoption of the web app by HCPs in a consultation setting will indeed benefit patient care for women and girls with FGM/C.

Keywords: 3D; FGM/C; anatomy; consultation; female genital mutilation or cutting; health care provider; interactive; patients; vulva; web app.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshot of the 3D web app upon opening.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshot of the 3D web app after rotation and removal of the pelvis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dawson AJ, Turkmani S, Varol N, Nanayakkara S, Sullivan E, Homer CSE. Midwives' experiences of caring for women with female genital mutilation: insights and ways forward for practice in Australia. Women Birth. 2015 Sep;28(3):207–214. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.01.007.S1871-5192(15)00009-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abdulcadir J, Rodriguez MI, Say L. Research gaps in the care of women with female genital mutilation: an analysis. BJOG. 2015 Feb;122(3):294–303. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13217. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Evans C, Tweheyo R, McGarry J, Eldridge J, McCormick C, Nkoyo V, Higginbottom GMA. What are the experiences of seeking, receiving and providing FGM-related healthcare? Perspectives of health professionals and women/girls who have undergone FGM: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence. BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 14;7(12):e018170. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018170. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=29247096 bmjopen-2017-018170 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Evans C, Tweheyo R, McGarry J, Eldridge J, Albert J, Nkoyo V, Higginbottom G. Improving care for women and girls who have undergone female genital mutilation/cutting: qualitative systematic reviews. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2019;7:31. doi: 10.3310/hsdr07310. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnson-Agbakwu CE, Manin E. Sculptors of African women's bodies: forces reshaping the embodiment of female genital cutting in the west. Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jul;50(5):1949–1957. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01710-1. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32328914 10.1007/s10508-020-01710-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed