Strengthening Association through Causal Inference
- PMID: 37768861
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010305
Strengthening Association through Causal Inference
Abstract
Understanding causal association and inference is critical to study health risks, treatment effectiveness, and the impact of health care interventions. Although defining causality has traditionally been limited to rigorous, experimental contexts, techniques to estimate causality from observational data are highly valuable for clinical questions in which randomization may not be feasible or appropriate. In this review, the authors highlight several methodologic options to deduce causality from observational data, including regression discontinuity, interrupted time series, and difference-in-differences approaches. Understanding the potential applications, assumptions, and limitations of quasi-experimental methods for observational data can expand our interpretation of causal relationships for surgical conditions.
Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
References
-
- Hernán MA. The C-word: scientific euphemisms do not improve causal inference from observational data. Am J Public Health 2018;108:616–619.
-
- Instructions for authors—July 2021. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;138:138–155.
-
- Chung KC, Swanson JA, Schmitz D, Sullivan D, Rohrich RJ. Introducing evidence-based medicine to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1385–1389.
-
- Wilcox AJ. Birth weight and perinatal mortality: the effect of maternal smoking. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137:1098–1104.
-
- Chung KC, Kim HM, Malay S, Shauver MJ; Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial Group. The Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial (WRIST): 12-month outcomes from a multicenter international randomized clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145:1054e–1066e.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources