Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep 28;23(1):492.
doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04097-9.

Liver injury in children: signal analysis of suspected drugs based on the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system

Affiliations

Liver injury in children: signal analysis of suspected drugs based on the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system

Yan Liu et al. BMC Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: Evidence of drug-induced liver injury is abundant in adults but is lacking in children. Our aim was to identify suspected drug signals associated with pediatric liver injury.

Methods: Hepatic adverse events (HAEs) among children reported in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System were analyzed. A descriptive analysis was performed to summarize pediatric HAEs, and a disproportionality analysis was conducted by evaluating reporting odds ratios (RORs) and proportional reporting ratios to detect suspected drugs.

Results: Here, 14,143 pediatric cases were reported, specifically 49.6% in males, 45.1% in females, and 5.2% unknown. Most patients (68.8%) were 6-18 years old. Hospitalization ranked first among definite outcomes (7,207 cases, 37.2%). In total, 264 disproportionate drug signals were identified. The top 10 drugs by the number of reports were paracetamol (1,365; ROR, 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.4-3.8), methotrexate (878; ROR, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.3-2.7), vincristine (649; ROR, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.8-3.3), valproic acid (511; ROR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.9-3.6), cyclophosphamide (490; ROR, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.2-2.6), tacrolimus (427; ROR, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.2-2.7), prednisone (416; ROR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.9-2.3), prednisolone (401; ROR, 2.3; 95% CI, 2.1-2.5), etoposide (378; ROR, 2.3; 95% CI, 2.1-2.6), and cytarabine (344; ROR, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.5-3.2). After excluding validated hepatotoxic drugs, six were newly detected, specifically acetylcysteine, thiopental, temazepam, nefopam, primaquine, and pyrimethamine.

Conclusions: The hepatotoxic risk associated with 264 signals needs to be noted in practice. The causality of hepatotoxicity and mechanism among new signals should be verified with preclinical and clinical studies.

Keywords: Children; Liver injury; Pharmacovigilance; Signal analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Annual cases of hepatic adverse events in children from 2004 to 2020

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andrade RJ, Chalasani N, Björnsson ES, Suzuki A, Kullak-Ublick GA, Watkins PB, et al. Drug-induced liver injury. Nat reviews Disease primers. 2019;5(1):58. - PubMed
    1. Chalasani NP, Maddur H, Russo MW, Wong RJ, Reddy KR. ACG Clinical Guideline: diagnosis and management of Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(5):878–98. - PubMed
    1. Yu Y, Mao Y, Chen C. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury. J Practical Hepatol. 2017;20(02):257–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shen T, Liu Y, Shang J, Xie Q, Li J, Yan M, et al. Incidence and etiology of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Mainland China. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(8):2230–41e11. - PubMed
    1. Suk KT, Kim DJ, Kim CH, Park SH, Yoon JH, Kim YS, et al. A prospective nationwide study of drug-induced liver injury in Korea. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(9):1380–7. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances