Malleability of spatial skills: bridging developmental psychology and toy design for joyful STEAM development
- PMID: 37771811
- PMCID: PMC10523793
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1137003
Malleability of spatial skills: bridging developmental psychology and toy design for joyful STEAM development
Abstract
Previous research has established that advances in spatial cognition predict STEAM success, and construction toys provide ample opportunities to foster spatial cognition. Despite various construction toy designs in the market, mostly brick-shaped building blocks are used in spatial cognition research. This group of toys is known to enhance mental rotation; however, mental rotation is not the only way to comprehend the environment three-dimensionally. More specifically, mental folding and perspective taking training have not received enough attention as they can also be enhanced with the construction toys, which are framed based on the 2×2 classification of spatial skills (intrinsic-static, intrinsic-dynamic, extrinsic-static, extrinsic-dynamic). To address these gaps, we compile evidence from both developmental psychology and toy design fields to show the central role played by mental folding and perspective taking skills as well as the importance of the variety in toy designs. The review was conducted systematically by searching peer reviewed design and psychology journals and conference proceedings. We suggest that, over and above their physical properties, construction toys offer affordances to elicit spatial language, gesture, and narrative among child-caregiver dyads. These interactions are essential for the development of spatial skills in both children and their caregivers. As developmental psychology and toy design fields are two domains that can contribute to the purpose of developing construction toys to boost spatial skills, we put forward six recommendations to bridge the current gaps between these fields. Consequently, new toy designs and empirical evidence regarding malleability of different spatial skills can contribute to the informal STEAM development.
Keywords: construction toys; informal STEAM development; mental folding; mental rotation; perspective taking; spatial cognition; toy design.
Copyright © 2023 İleri, Erşan, Kalaça, Coşkun, Göksun and Küntay.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Looking deeper into the toy box: Understanding caregiver toy selection decisions.Infant Behav Dev. 2021 Feb;62:101529. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101529. Epub 2021 Jan 17. Infant Behav Dev. 2021. PMID: 33472096
-
Effects of ordinary and adaptive toys on pre-school children with developmental disabilities.Res Dev Disabil. 2008 Sep-Oct;29(5):459-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Oct 23. Res Dev Disabil. 2008. PMID: 17936580
-
Toy Preferences among 3-to-4-Year-Old Children: The Impact of Socio-Demographic Factors and Developmental Characteristics.Psychol Russ. 2023 Jun 30;16(2):72-84. doi: 10.11621/pir.2023.0206. eCollection 2023. Psychol Russ. 2023. PMID: 37818346 Free PMC article.
-
How Do Children Play with Toy Trains and for What Benefits? A Scoping Review.Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023 Sep 30;13(10):2112-2134. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe13100149. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023. PMID: 37887150 Free PMC article.
-
Toy Age-Labeling: An Overview for Pediatricians of How Toys Receive Their Age Safety and Developmental Designations.Pediatrics. 2016 Jul;138(1):e20151803. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1803. Epub 2016 Jun 7. Pediatrics. 2016. PMID: 27273747 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-term cognitive and neurophysiological effects of mental rotation training.NPJ Sci Learn. 2025 Apr 2;10(1):16. doi: 10.1038/s41539-025-00309-2. NPJ Sci Learn. 2025. PMID: 40175376 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Agirbas S., Kiziltan A. S., Badem Ç. I., Baykal G. E. (2022). Scaffolding preschool Children’s upcycling experiences through free vs. guided play activities. 6th FabLearn Europe / MakeEd Conference 2022.
-
- Alibali M. W. (2005). Gesture in spatial cognition: expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 5, 307–331. doi: 10.1207/s15427633scc0504_2 - DOI
-
- Angerer B., Schreiber C. (2019). Representational dynamics in the domain of iterated mental paper folding. Cogn. Syst. Res. 54, 217–231. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.11.011 - DOI
-
- Apperly I. (2012). Mindreaders the cognitive basis of ‘theory of mind’. 1st. London: Psychology Press.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials