Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Sep 12:14:1137003.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1137003. eCollection 2023.

Malleability of spatial skills: bridging developmental psychology and toy design for joyful STEAM development

Çiğdem İrem İleri  1 , Melisa Erşan  2 , Duru Kalaça  1   3 , Aykut Coşkun  4 , Tilbe Göksun  1 , Aylin C Küntay  1
Affiliations
Review

Malleability of spatial skills: bridging developmental psychology and toy design for joyful STEAM development

Çiğdem İrem İleri et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Previous research has established that advances in spatial cognition predict STEAM success, and construction toys provide ample opportunities to foster spatial cognition. Despite various construction toy designs in the market, mostly brick-shaped building blocks are used in spatial cognition research. This group of toys is known to enhance mental rotation; however, mental rotation is not the only way to comprehend the environment three-dimensionally. More specifically, mental folding and perspective taking training have not received enough attention as they can also be enhanced with the construction toys, which are framed based on the 2×2 classification of spatial skills (intrinsic-static, intrinsic-dynamic, extrinsic-static, extrinsic-dynamic). To address these gaps, we compile evidence from both developmental psychology and toy design fields to show the central role played by mental folding and perspective taking skills as well as the importance of the variety in toy designs. The review was conducted systematically by searching peer reviewed design and psychology journals and conference proceedings. We suggest that, over and above their physical properties, construction toys offer affordances to elicit spatial language, gesture, and narrative among child-caregiver dyads. These interactions are essential for the development of spatial skills in both children and their caregivers. As developmental psychology and toy design fields are two domains that can contribute to the purpose of developing construction toys to boost spatial skills, we put forward six recommendations to bridge the current gaps between these fields. Consequently, new toy designs and empirical evidence regarding malleability of different spatial skills can contribute to the informal STEAM development.

Keywords: construction toys; informal STEAM development; mental folding; mental rotation; perspective taking; spatial cognition; toy design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Toy examples to foster mental rotation (left to right; Unit Blocks, Lincoln Logs, Bristle Block).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Toy examples to foster mental rotation cont (left to right; KüpTak, Learning Resources City Engineering, Katamino).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Tangible user interface examples to foster mental rotation (left to right; Boda Blocks, AlgoBrix, Pixio).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Toy examples to foster mental rotation (Mega Bloks on the left) and mental folding (middle to right; ZoZoplay & Magna Tiles).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Toy examples to foster mental folding cont. (left to right; GeoMag & Squigz Fat Brain Toys).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Toy examples to foster perspective taking (left to right; Strawctures, Stocks, Blockspot®).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Toy examples to foster perspective taking cont (left to right; Gigi Blocks, Imagination Playground, The Toy).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Agirbas S., Kiziltan A. S., Badem Ç. I., Baykal G. E. (2022). Scaffolding preschool Children’s upcycling experiences through free vs. guided play activities. 6th FabLearn Europe / MakeEd Conference 2022.
    1. Alibali M. W. (2005). Gesture in spatial cognition: expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 5, 307–331. doi: 10.1207/s15427633scc0504_2 - DOI
    1. Angerer B., Schreiber C. (2019). Representational dynamics in the domain of iterated mental paper folding. Cogn. Syst. Res. 54, 217–231. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.11.011 - DOI
    1. Apperly I. (2012). Mindreaders the cognitive basis of ‘theory of mind’. 1st. London: Psychology Press.
    1. Atit K., Shipley T. F., Tikoff B. (2013). Twisting space: are rigid and non-rigid mental transformations separate spatial skills? Cogn. Process. 14, 163–173. doi: 10.1007/s10339-013-0550-8, PMID: - DOI - PubMed